Dean Obeidallah Again With Another Liberal Whiny Rant.

 Somehow when I hit publish it instead went to draft. I have no idea how but this was actually written days ago not today.

Well as I was messing around on Yahoo I ran across another liberal whiny rant by Mr. Nonsensical, Dean Obeidallah himself.

In it he goes hog wild after Republicans again, outdoing even himself and his rant against Oklahoman Rep. Bennett. 

Side note, sent a nice letter of support to Rep. John Bennett today for standing up and speaking the truth about Islam and the threat it poses to all non-Muslims in the world and to us, America.

I encourage you to write or call Rep. Bennett to show your support at the following. 

Capitol Address:

2300 N. Lincoln Blvd.
Room 300A
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
(405) 557-7315

Email: john.bennett@okhouse.gov

Good ole Dean is really frothing at the mouth with theatrics in this one. Calling conservatives "Crazies" and referring to their beliefs as "Lunacy" among other things.

He first attacks Russell Pierce of Arizona for making statements about birth control for women on welfare. He makes it sound like this is some new idea that Mr. Pierce came up with and that it is crazy and he is crazy. 

Well Mr. Obeidallah, its been an idea around for a very long time and its really quite simple. If you want to be on welfare, as in have everyone paying for your a$$, then you don't need to be popping out ten kids more than when you went on it. If you want to have us foot the bill then you don't have more kids until you can get a job and support yourself and them without taxpayer money to do it.

Nothing new there. Matter of fact I believe there is something similar without the birth control requirement in the welfare reform law democrats, Clinton and Republicans, Newt passed back in the 90s. No more money if you have more kids. 

The problem is you liberals attacked that as harming all those babies these women keep on having when they can't afford them. You say denying them extra money for each baby popped out while they're on welfare is unfair. 

So what is a good solution besides paying for them to have children we have to pay for? How about saying while on welfare you will also be on birth control and not have more kids. Such a simple, reasonable idea yet you make it into something else entirely.

The other part of his comments was to say if you want to do drugs or drink you should be tested for those substances and if you do them then you pay for it but you don't get welfare to do it.

I don't find those comments offensive or wrong in any way. They make as much sense as when I first heard the same idea back in the 80s. You don't get to pop kids out while on welfare on someone else's dime. 

What I find offensive and wrong is what happened after he said them. 

First of all he didn't stand by his comments but instead cried they belonged to someone else and he forgot to "Attribute" them properly. That was the cowards way out and wrong of him. It offends me that politicians cower in the face of attack instead of asking "Yeah what of it?" Grow a set and stand up to this $hit for crying out loud.

Then we can get into the dems attacking him for it and being allowed to run the narrative about it. Republicans were stupid in this case for allowing it as they are everywhere else they've let it go on. 

Lastly though his fellow Republicans ran cowering and sniveling to jump on the dem bandwagon and denounce Mr. Pierce rather than stand by him as they should have done. Shame on them for their cowardice. I'm sure you and many other dems were just wriggling in absolute glee about it.

At least Mr. Pierce knows who his friends are not now and I know who not to ever vote for when I move out to Arizona, those sniveling cowards who make me ashamed to be a Republican. 

Your next attack of note is on Richard Mourdock who by twisting what he said have made him out to be some nut job rather than a human being who made a simple statement that was and is true. 

All he said was any baby is a gift of God and if it exists it must exist because God intended it to. He did not say God intended a man to rape a woman. He did not justify rape or anything like that. 

If you are religious and believe things happen in life as God intended them to happen or because God intended them to then a pregnancy is something he intended otherwise it would not be. 

Once again though, dems pounced on it and were allowed to run the narrative about it. While Republicans cowered sniveling and abandoned one of their own, even condemning him for it Mourdock was sunk.

The only shameful conduct was once again on the part of dems and Republican cowards. 

Then we can move on to Sharron Angle who you go after for saying we might need 2A remedies to take back our country. Again you want to take it to be something insane and bad when in actuality its not. 

Its reality. One I doubt will happen not because it is not needed but because people don't have the guts to actually do it. I imagine the dems were allowed to control the story on that one too and I'd be surprised if you didn't find Republicans bowing and scraping while attacking one of their own instead of standing up and saying "You're damn right!" People don't have the wherewithal to actually stand up and fight for this country so you and your ilk will ultimately win not because of merit but because of cowardice by the majority to do what is needed to take back and save this country from the destructive path which liberals have taken us down.

The comment about "Taking out" Reid wasn't a call to kill him but I'm sure you like twisting that around to be that. It was a simple statement that he had to go in the election which after all she was running in and was kinda the point. But again I'm sure dems took it and twisted it into something else, were allowed to yet again control the narrative, and got Republicans to denounce her.

As you continue your rant about "Right wing crazies," "Nuts" and the "Crazy train" you once again miss it completely.

You attack another Republican who apparently also has warned about the Muslim threat to this country and Joni Earnst as being a fruitcake because she's said she's going after O-care and supports states' rights. You also take exception with her calling out Obama as a dictator which he's acting like with his illegal unilateral actions. 

Which is probably where the reference "Dictator" comes into play as someone who is not governing under the law as law dictates but doing whatever his sorry a$$ wants to in spite of the law such as ignoring it or making his own laws outside of Congress. The same as a dictator would do? You see? 

Now if you knew anything at all you'd know that all law derives from the Judea-Christian bible and its God. But hey you're young and dumb, I can understand your ignorance. Maybe you'd be more familiar with other countries where the law derives from Allah and is called I believe "Sharia" Only Western law isn't barbaric and savage as Muslim law is. 

Our laws trace back to what they trace back to and while they have changed and become secular they got their start in the annals of religion long ago. Ever hear "Thou Shalt Not Kill" hence "Murder" as an example. 

Anyway on to your next which would be Mr. Tillis in NC. 

I'd really like to know the context surrounding that quote. I find it very hard to believe it as written is not part of something broader. 

Ah how did I know it. I found the entire quote which is totally true and a very valid message. Once again the dems and you have taken something and twisted it into something else. You've then ran with it and are being allowed to control the narrative on it. 

But that doesn't make you right for here is the ENTIRE quote wherein that sentence lies. (From Talking Points Memo dot com 5/06/14 http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/thom-tillis-divide-and-conquer-poor)

"What we have to do is find a way to divide and conquer the people who are on assistance," Tillis said. "We have to show respect for that woman who has cerebral palsy and had no choice, in her condition, that needs help and that we should help. And we need to get those folks to look down at these people who choose to get into a condition that makes them dependent on the government and say at some point, ‘You’re on your own. We may end up taking care of those babies, but we’re not going to take care of you.’ And we’ve got to start having that serious discussion."

Wow entirely different when seen in context isn't it? 

He's simply saying the moochers are going to have to be cut off from the teat at some point but the genuine needy must be protected. What a shocking idea and absolutely horrific isn't it?

Only to a liberal. 

The next part is again something you've taken completely out of context and have twisted to make it into something racist. His comment that the traditional population of NC wasn't growing while black and Hispanic populations were. World of difference if you look at everything he said from the article you linked to.The article itself is biased like you are.

(Article from Talking Points Memo 6/17/2014  http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/thom-tillis-traditional-voters-north-carolina-hispanics-african-americans)  

 Conversation between host and Mr. Tillis

William: Let's start fairly broad with the Republican Party. You watch— and probably see many more— polls than I do or we do in general. When you watch what's happening in presidential politics. When you see this shift that Hispanics used to be in the Republican Party and now they're clearly on the other side of the aisle —when you see all of these things that have transpired, what do you think about? what is going on in the Republican Party?

Tillis: Well I think it has more to do what's going on in the demographics of this country and recognizing that and then having a platform and a message that resonates. If you take a look, you mentioned the Hispanic population —the African American population, there's a number of things that our party stands for that they embrace. I think we have to do a better job of communicating it. I think we have to do a better job of being out there in between elections, garnering support for the things that we're trying to advance. And I think that we need a focus on limited government and free markets which is something that's appealing to everybody. That kind of work will position us for those growing sectors. The traditional population of North Carolina and the United States is more or less stable. It's not growing. The African American population is roughly growing but the Hispanic population and the other immigrant populations are growing in significant numbers. We've got to resonate with those future voters.

If anything you should be ashamed of twisting and completely, repeatedly misrepresenting what was said by these people in some petty lame attempt to demonize them and further a liberal agenda. 

Hopefully liberal dems have not been allowed to control this one nor have Republican politicians abandoned him. 

Your final potshot at Gov. Brownback is once again absurd. Why is telling people to take responsibility for themselves so anathema to you liberals. All he did was tell this woman apparently whining about it to go find another boss if she didn't like the policies of the one she had. Guess what? That's a good idea. I don't like where I work I would go someplace else that was more amenable not sit and whine and want the government to force my boss to be everything I wanted. 

Your "War on women" has been an entirely democratic created fantasy that you've been allowed to not only make up but run with and get away with. Why I don't know but you have. There is no war on women. Never has been and never will be except by muzzies. 

Not everything that doesn't meet with liberal ideology constitutes some delusional war no matter how much you claim it does. Much like many of your other claims which you bandy about simply because they don't agree with that agenda. 

The Hobby Lobby decision for example did not take away one single thing from women. A woman today can go and get a contraceptive device whenever she wants to. Nothing changed except for one little thing. A boss doesn't necessarily have to pay for it in some limited circumstances. 

That's it, no big war or anything else. If a woman wants whatever a woman can still go and get the same thing she could have gotten the day before that decision came out. Same exact thing. 

The thing is though its a liberal agenda to force everyone to pay for other people for everything. Your agenda of forcing all employers to pay for other peoples' personal items in this case was stymied. You libs don't like that. I can understand that. What I don't understand is why you've been allowed to fabricate lies and then spread them with impunity. That, I don't get. 

Its kind of like what Rush said that got him so attacked by you libs. Why should the taxpayer/school have to pay for you to go out and get laid safely? Nobody told Fluke she couldn't get contraceptives but no one but her should have to foot the bill so she can have safe sex. Keep your damn pants on if you can't afford a rubber. 

It applies to many of the things that you brought up in your rant. You and liberals think everybody else should pay for everything for everybody and no one should be responsible or have any obligations to do for themselves or meet any guidelines for anything. 

Why? Why is suggesting that so crazy? If I want to have sex I buy my own damn rubbers. If I had to go on food stamps I worked my butt off to get back off of them as quickly as possible. When we didn't have money I didn't get my wife pregnant with more kids because we couldn't afford them. And the list goes on because its called taking responsibility for yourself which is sorely lacking these days.

What I haven't gotten for a very long time is why Republicans repeatedly run such piss poor campaigns and platforms. They get attacked and do not fight back. Do not wrest control of the story from dem hands which would be quite easy to do in most cases. They allow your kind to get away with whatever you want to and I just don't get it. I could run much better campaigns that these so called professionals have. Its astounding that they miss so much they could go after the dems on and do so little to help their own candidate. Just unbelievable. 

You may be right about Republicans losing and democrats winning this November but not for the reasons you think. 

I'll tell you why there is a good chance they will lose and its not because they might run off at the mouth its because they probably won't. They've ran conservatives out of the election and are not following any conservative principles at all. As you noted they've been keeping their mouths shut but not because they are trying not to say anything disastrous but because what's left in the candidate field has nothing conservative to say as they don't believe in conservative ideals and principles.

You see conservatives want people to stand up, speak up and take a stand on things. They want them to stand by the things they've taken positions on and to fight for those things we hold dear. 

There is an establishment in Washington that has abandoned the principles of the Republicans and conservatism. They have denigrated conservative ideas, beliefs, representatives, and candidates. They have stabbed us in the back on core issues which are important not only to us but to the nation as well such as the invasion. A couple of days ago Boehner stated amnesty must be passed for the benefit of the economy. They have repeatedly chosen the democrats over their own people, they have betrayed us. 

They don't speak up. They keep quiet and refuse to take a stand on anything. They mouth general platitudes that are meaningless and say nothing that is anything.

Its their keeping quiet that will doom them. Its their betraying all Republicans stand for that will doom them. Its burying it's conservative side that will doom them. 

The establishment has chosen to stick a knife into conservatives and betray us. They have chosen democrats and their agenda over that of true Republicans. They have even conspired with the enemy to defeat conservatives in the elections. 

Their silence and betrayal will defeat them because if they had stayed true, if they had spoken up and taken a stand we'd vote for them.

The other nails in the coffin are allowing the democrats to set the narrative about everything and again staying silent instead of calling out their constant lies. 

Its about them running scared of the dems instead of standing up and challenging them. Instead of showing the lies and distortions they snivel and cow before them and apologize when they have nothing to apologize for. 

They abandoned conservatives and other Republicans on the expediency of politics instead of standing by them and fighting for and with them.They no longer believe as true Republicans do.

They allow the liberal agenda to go forward rather than fight it and choose democrats over their own ideals and people. They are as I like to call them democrat lites. They believe and follow a less liberal ideology than the democrats but still a liberal one. 

Finally after the way they've treated conservatives they then show up with marching orders that we'd better turn out and vote for them in November. After betraying us and screwing over our candidates they tell us we have no choice but to vote for them now.

They miss the big picture entirely. 

One of the things you'll see on Twitter lately are posts saying Obama only won by a couple million votes and over nine million of us conservatives stayed home in 2012. (I think that was the correct figures roughly) Therefore we must go and vote Republican this election. 

The problem is though that they were screwing us then too. They attacked the conservative candidates and collaborated together to defeat, malign, impugn and otherwise take down any conservatives running. They marginalized us as you try and do and didn't want us to play in their sand box.

They shoved a liberal masking himself as a Republican down our throats as a candidate and told us to shut up and go vote for him you don't have any choice. 

Many of us felt we should go and vote Republican even though we detested Romney. I was one of those who said they were not going to vote at all. I caved in and went at the last minute anyway. Apparently over nine million of us decided to send the message anyway and did not.

While many were saying no one was stupid enough to elect that man to another four years I said oh yes they were. And I was right. If they could do it once they were certainly idiotic enough to go for a second round. 

They did. My vote didn't matter and sadly the nine million plus didn't either because the establishment Republicans have not listened. 

Instead they've doubled down, tripled down and more on treating us like scum and making sure we know we are not wanted anywhere near their halls of power. They have went so far as to collude with dems to defeat a conservative candidate and in other elections as well. They've agreed to everything the dems want and gotten nothing substantial in return. 

They've betrayed conservatives and this country.

Now once again they are telling us we have no choice. We have to go and vote for them so get going. Chop, chop!

The thing is nine million plus people tried to tell them our vote matters, our party matters, our beliefs, ideals and this country matter. 

The establishment Republican answer to that has been F**k you.

I think that not only will those nine million plus from before not vote, that the millions more that got talked into voting anyway will not vote this time round either. 

At least I hope so.

I know I will not be voting for any candidate except a conservative one if there is one on the ballot for me.

Its going to be our turn to say the same back to the Republican establishment this November and that is why I think you and your democrats will win. 

Maybe they'll get the message this time, maybe this time the establishment will listen. 

Don't hold out a lot of hope but maybe.