In a follow up to what I wrote before.
The Palestinians in the form of Abbas the "President" of their terrorist existence are now begging the UN to place them under "International Protection" since they are getting their asses kicked royally after starting a war once again with Israel.
http://yhoo.it/1kT7RY2
I find it highly funny that they attack Israel by killing three innocent children like they always do and now that Israel is saying enough of this and taking them out they are crying bloody murder.
They don't like being on the losing end of things obviously, who does.
But Hamas is getting slammed and losing leaders right and left while the terrorists are in general getting their asses handed to them.
They once again screwed with the wrong people.
What I don't and won't find funny is the whining liberals crying come Monday at the UN making demands on Israel to not defend themselves against attacks.
And while Abbas is crying to the UN his people are still attacking Israel with rockets constantly.
In other words Abbas wants the UN to protect heir terrorist asses and stop Israel from defending themselves while they get to continue to fire upon Israel without consequence.
Instead of telling them "Too bad, you asked for it and now you've got it, so live with it" they will do everything they can against Israel and once again will try to allow the Palestinian terrorists to get away with it.
Also of note more crying is going on about Israel succeeding in doing more damage than they have been able to do to Israel. So Israel should be stopped and condemned for winning.
What a crock of $hit.
Sadly though that is what will happen and I just hope Israel tells them all to piss off in no uncertain terms.
They need to level these terrorists and run them out of Israel once and for all. Let all these Muslim countries take these terrorists in and do something with them. It's been sixty some years of Israel putting up with their sorry terrorist butts and its time they went and Israel was allowed to live in peace.
Also Muslims are marching and rioting in France, attacking Jews and their synagogues. Too bad guns are outlawed there, I have a solution that involves Mr. Remnington that would put stop to it real fast.
This is what happens when a country allows illegals to flood their borders and set up shop in their country with impunity.
Then again, look no father than our own country to see the same thing allowed here. The ones we have are now making demands of us about everything from wanting amnesty to welfare.
Like France we have a bunch of apologists who rather than round them up and send them the hell someplace else are instead fighting to see how fast they can instead, accommodate those demands.
France needs to send in the troops with guns and start shooting the bastards who want to riot and we need to start sending in our troops to protect our borders and keep them out in the first place before they get to where they can get uppity and start making any demands.
They also need to round them all up and send them packing. Here and in France, all of us would find our lives and countries much the better for it.
Lock and load people, lock and load.
Sunday, July 13, 2014
Where do they come up with this stuff
Have to say I've been on Twitter a couple of times today. Don't usually spend a lot of time on it but did a bit today.
Reading about the Israeli stuff going on left me scratching my head.
There is this outrage that the terrorists so far have been ineffective with their attacks and Israel has been quite effective.
In other words because Israel has prevented the Palestinian terrorists weapons from doing very much damage to Israel they shouldn't be doing very much damage to the Palestinian terrorists.
Who thinks like that?
My God have the liberals really succeeded in warping basic thinking skills and common sense to that great a degree?
Lord, I sure hope not.
When I first moved out to the SE US where I currently reside something happened a few years after involving one of my daughters.
This girl staying the night on a sleepover hauled off and hit my daughter in the mouth.
My daughter being taught well by me, decked her in response.
End of conversation, at least after the crying and taking of the other girl to her house, right?
Wrong.
All these other girls that were spending the night were having a huge fit screaming my daughter was at fault in this.
The reason she was in the wrong was not for hitting this girl back and cleaning her clock but because my daughter hit her back harder than the girl had struck her.
When I heard all these girls going after my daughter I went in to break it up and asked what was going on. When they told me this bizarre idea I just stood there shaking my head in disbelief.
I mean who could possibly think this way? If someone takes the first punch and does a piss poor job of it since when is it incumbent upon the attacked to pull their punch to equal the poor performance of the attacker?
Absolutely bizarre. I told the girls in question and while they shut up about it they now thought I was crazy.
I mean I taught my kids to never start it but feel free to finish it.
My daughter that night did so.
So I just chalked it up to some regional thing unique to the South or something since it certainly wasn't the way the ball bounced out west for damn sure.
But here again I'm seeing the same crap from these people about Israel and their war on terrorists.
The terrorists are doing a piss poor job of it and for some reason Israel shouldn't be wiping the floor with them since its not reciprocal.
Reading these bizarre comments reminded me of that story with my daughter.
Where does somebody come up with such nonsense?
Just because the terrorists aren't inflicting the same amount of damage as Israel is doesn't proscribe Israel from kicking their freakin asses here people.
Matter of fact Israel is taking the approach in this case of not starting it but damn well finishing it. At least hopefully they probably think.
Overwhelming retaliatory force for attacks being perpetrated upon them is a long standing principle or doctrine if you will.
Now that the terrorists are getting their asses kicked by Israel they are demanding the UN and other countries force Israel to cease fire. Not to mention the terrorists use civilian locations and people to hide behind then cry foul over those locations being hit in retaliation.
On top of these things the Palestinian people fully support the terrorists and terrorism and one way they do so is to put themselves and their children in harm's way, basically in front of the terrorists to try and prevent Israel from attacking.
Then they cry and whine that Israel is hitting civilian targets and killing civilians. They caused it and now they are using it as a media ploy for sympathy and to get Israel condemned by the world.
Unfortunately there are enough Israel haters and liberals for them to succeed But I think Israel is getting a bit tired of hearing from them and doesn't much care what they like or don't like anymore.
Which in my opinion is a very good thing.
I'll say it again, I hope Israel bombs them to rubble and then let them try and attack. They can pick up the rocks and throw them like their children do now.
I'm saddened to see the children suffer like this but look not to Israel but to the children's parents for who is at fault.
Look not at Israel to condemn for defending themselves from attack from these savages but look at the savages who are attacking them.
If only Obama et al would take a page from Israel's playbook on how to secure a border and do the same thing on ours. Now that its been shown that Mexico and other countries are actively conspiring against us, looking to fully aid and foster the invasion of our country, steps to counter them and the invasion should be taken immediately.
They won't be but they should be.
God Bless Israel and let them fully triumph over their enemies, the Muslim.
Reading about the Israeli stuff going on left me scratching my head.
There is this outrage that the terrorists so far have been ineffective with their attacks and Israel has been quite effective.
In other words because Israel has prevented the Palestinian terrorists weapons from doing very much damage to Israel they shouldn't be doing very much damage to the Palestinian terrorists.
Who thinks like that?
My God have the liberals really succeeded in warping basic thinking skills and common sense to that great a degree?
Lord, I sure hope not.
When I first moved out to the SE US where I currently reside something happened a few years after involving one of my daughters.
This girl staying the night on a sleepover hauled off and hit my daughter in the mouth.
My daughter being taught well by me, decked her in response.
End of conversation, at least after the crying and taking of the other girl to her house, right?
Wrong.
All these other girls that were spending the night were having a huge fit screaming my daughter was at fault in this.
The reason she was in the wrong was not for hitting this girl back and cleaning her clock but because my daughter hit her back harder than the girl had struck her.
When I heard all these girls going after my daughter I went in to break it up and asked what was going on. When they told me this bizarre idea I just stood there shaking my head in disbelief.
I mean who could possibly think this way? If someone takes the first punch and does a piss poor job of it since when is it incumbent upon the attacked to pull their punch to equal the poor performance of the attacker?
Absolutely bizarre. I told the girls in question and while they shut up about it they now thought I was crazy.
I mean I taught my kids to never start it but feel free to finish it.
My daughter that night did so.
So I just chalked it up to some regional thing unique to the South or something since it certainly wasn't the way the ball bounced out west for damn sure.
But here again I'm seeing the same crap from these people about Israel and their war on terrorists.
The terrorists are doing a piss poor job of it and for some reason Israel shouldn't be wiping the floor with them since its not reciprocal.
Reading these bizarre comments reminded me of that story with my daughter.
Where does somebody come up with such nonsense?
Just because the terrorists aren't inflicting the same amount of damage as Israel is doesn't proscribe Israel from kicking their freakin asses here people.
Matter of fact Israel is taking the approach in this case of not starting it but damn well finishing it. At least hopefully they probably think.
Overwhelming retaliatory force for attacks being perpetrated upon them is a long standing principle or doctrine if you will.
Now that the terrorists are getting their asses kicked by Israel they are demanding the UN and other countries force Israel to cease fire. Not to mention the terrorists use civilian locations and people to hide behind then cry foul over those locations being hit in retaliation.
On top of these things the Palestinian people fully support the terrorists and terrorism and one way they do so is to put themselves and their children in harm's way, basically in front of the terrorists to try and prevent Israel from attacking.
Then they cry and whine that Israel is hitting civilian targets and killing civilians. They caused it and now they are using it as a media ploy for sympathy and to get Israel condemned by the world.
Unfortunately there are enough Israel haters and liberals for them to succeed But I think Israel is getting a bit tired of hearing from them and doesn't much care what they like or don't like anymore.
Which in my opinion is a very good thing.
I'll say it again, I hope Israel bombs them to rubble and then let them try and attack. They can pick up the rocks and throw them like their children do now.
I'm saddened to see the children suffer like this but look not to Israel but to the children's parents for who is at fault.
Look not at Israel to condemn for defending themselves from attack from these savages but look at the savages who are attacking them.
If only Obama et al would take a page from Israel's playbook on how to secure a border and do the same thing on ours. Now that its been shown that Mexico and other countries are actively conspiring against us, looking to fully aid and foster the invasion of our country, steps to counter them and the invasion should be taken immediately.
They won't be but they should be.
God Bless Israel and let them fully triumph over their enemies, the Muslim.
Brief Note on Comments.
I'm not exactly computer literate but tried to set this up to be so anyone can comment who wishes and even do so anonymously.
Someone who did comment a long time back said they had problems and something about having to register to do so.
I went back in and went over the settings once again and couldn't find out why that was so. Double checked all to make sure it seemed to say what I wanted it to which was anyone could comment even anonymously.
Whether it worked I don't know. If it didn't I don't know how to fix it.
So if you try or have tried to comment and ran into obstacles in doing so I apologize as that is not supposed to be the way it works.
Unfortunately if you have been asked to register or somehow have been prevented from easily commenting I don't know what to do about it to let you.
As far as I know there are no restrictions, hurdles or anything else to prevent you including moderation.
Thanks,
P
Someone who did comment a long time back said they had problems and something about having to register to do so.
I went back in and went over the settings once again and couldn't find out why that was so. Double checked all to make sure it seemed to say what I wanted it to which was anyone could comment even anonymously.
Whether it worked I don't know. If it didn't I don't know how to fix it.
So if you try or have tried to comment and ran into obstacles in doing so I apologize as that is not supposed to be the way it works.
Unfortunately if you have been asked to register or somehow have been prevented from easily commenting I don't know what to do about it to let you.
As far as I know there are no restrictions, hurdles or anything else to prevent you including moderation.
Thanks,
P
Saturday, July 12, 2014
Israel and Terrorists
Real quick.
Just ran across hashtag about Gaze being under attack.
Amazing, terrorists start war, terrorists losing war, terrorists crying about it now, terrorists wanting it to stop.
Too friggin bad.
Maybe they want it to stop because too much of their terrorist infrastructure is getting destroyed?
Just a thought.
I feel sorry for the children though, they always get caught up in these things and they are the ones who suffer.
I said this before, Israel needs to wipe the floor with them once and for all. Enough of this pussy footing around and playing games with these morons.
Take them out and bomb them back into the frikin stone age then let them find a missile to fire.
The terrorists started it killing those Israeli teens and then firing missiles into Israel and they are still doing it. Now they're crying bloody murder about getting their asses kicked.
Boo hoo....
Even though they are calling on everyone to condemn Israel they sill keep firing those missiles don't they?
Also another thing here is these terrorists use civilian locations like schools, hospitals, churches, homes, and apartment buildings to run their operations and fire missiles from.
The people allow and even encourage these terrorists fully supporting them.
With that in mind guess what become legitimate targets?
All those things.
Sorry you don't get to hide out in these places supported by the terrorist Muslims and then claim immunity from airstrikes.
Rock and roll Israel!!
Just ran across hashtag about Gaze being under attack.
Amazing, terrorists start war, terrorists losing war, terrorists crying about it now, terrorists wanting it to stop.
Too friggin bad.
Maybe they want it to stop because too much of their terrorist infrastructure is getting destroyed?
Just a thought.
I feel sorry for the children though, they always get caught up in these things and they are the ones who suffer.
I said this before, Israel needs to wipe the floor with them once and for all. Enough of this pussy footing around and playing games with these morons.
Take them out and bomb them back into the frikin stone age then let them find a missile to fire.
The terrorists started it killing those Israeli teens and then firing missiles into Israel and they are still doing it. Now they're crying bloody murder about getting their asses kicked.
Boo hoo....
Even though they are calling on everyone to condemn Israel they sill keep firing those missiles don't they?
Also another thing here is these terrorists use civilian locations like schools, hospitals, churches, homes, and apartment buildings to run their operations and fire missiles from.
The people allow and even encourage these terrorists fully supporting them.
With that in mind guess what become legitimate targets?
All those things.
Sorry you don't get to hide out in these places supported by the terrorist Muslims and then claim immunity from airstrikes.
Rock and roll Israel!!
Santa Rosa California.....Justice Served, for a change.
First of all a young man is dead and its a tragedy that it happened.
It was a horrible accident brought on by the boy in question but still it is very sad it happened.
What it wasn't was racist, discriminatory or murder as another minority is claiming.
A thirteen year old boy who looked much older, more like an adult, lost his life.
There is no doubt it was horribly tragic and no one wants something like that to happen especially the police officer involved.
This police officer received a call of a man with an assault rifle walking down the street. Upon responding he observed what appeared to be a young adult carrying exactly that, an assault rifle.
He exited his patrol car ordering the subject to drop the weapon repeatedly which the subject did not do.
Instead the subject turned towards the officer raising the weapon at the officer at which time the officer discharged his service weapon.
The assault weapon in question was an AK-47 assault rifle. The officer was a twenty year weapons expert and weapons training officer who identified the weapon in the subject's hands and once it was raised towards him fired in self defense.
This week the district attorney after a thorough investigation held a press conference where she announced the facts of the case and the determination of her office regarding the officer's conduct.
It turned out the young adult while looking much older was only thirteen years old. The second thing was the AK-47 assault rifle was a replica BB gun not a real bullet firing one.
Two pictures were up in the press conference, one showing the young man's weapon and the other a real AK-47.
Both looked exactly alike. No differences at all. The exact same in appearance.
The second was that the evidence clearly showed the officer fired in self-defense based on the information he had available to him at the time of the shooting.
The conclusion was that this was clearly a use of justified force and a clear case of firing in self defense.
The prosecutor stated no charges would be filed since the officer did not do anything wrong. She also stated that the state attorney general's office would not be filing any charges either as this was a justified use of force.
Justice in this case was finally served when in recent years far too many officers have been thrown under the bus in the name of political correctness and appeasement towards minority groups.
With the above said, its still a tragic event. Its something the officer will never recover from even if he returns to work. Not only has he been forced to take a life but he's taken the life of a child.
There is no getting over that, any of it. Its an officer's worst nightmare. I can remember training based on real life scenarios where an officer went into a house to search it and saw a shadow on a wall with a hand holding a gun. The officer in real life had turned and fired, killing the subject only to find out he'd just shot a little boy with a toy gun.
The scenario was fake and for training but it had happened to a police officer before. That was why it was there. It had happened in different ways many times.
Its not something that you want to contemplate but have to so you hopefully don't end up in a similar situation as this Santa Rosa officer did.
What makes this even more tragic is that when it happened the Mexicans went ballistic out there. They started screaming racism, discrimination, murder, and a host of other baseless charges at the officer and his department.
They held protests and marches about the officer and the department for which he worked. They said it was first degree murder, it was because the officer was racist and hated Mexicans, they said the murder happened because the department and its officers hated Mexicans.
They said a lot of things like always get said but what they didn't say was it was because a young man took a real looking gun out with him and pointed it at a police officer after not listening to orders to drop the weapon over and over again.
Maybe the anger should be directed at a teenager not doing what he was told instead. If he had he'd be alive. Maybe the anger should be directed at the fact he was allowed out of the house with a 100% real looking assault rifle to walk down the street with. If he hadn't been he would be alive. Maybe the anger should have been directed a number of places other than where it was but it wasn't.
Instead.another minority group wanted to scapegoat the cops and blame a police officer for another's actions.
While the officer will live with this for the rest of his life, he should be the one who is angry because if the young man hadn't did these things the shooting would never have happened. Yet I can bet the officer isn't angry, isn't furious that he was put in that horrific position but instead incredibly sad and horrified by what happened.
In the aftermath the Mexicans demanded the FBI investigate the racist murder of this young man even though it wasn't. The Mexicans demanded the Justice Dept. investigate the cop and department on civil rights charges even though none were violated.
The Mexicans, of course, demanded the prosecution and jailing of the officer in this case by the district attorney or some other agency.
Once the report came out from the district attorney's office showing clearly that the officer acted in justifiable self defense one would think it would be over but of course its not.
The Mexicans are protesting the decision and making continued demands for the arrest and prosecution of the murderer of this boy.
They are still marching and protesting the racist cop, department and apparently everyone else.
The FBI is unbelievably investigating this and so is the justice department. For what reason I have no idea but its not the first time either one have jumped into things they shouldn't. I believe there is also a law suit going on as well. I think its based on the ridiculous civil rights violation claim as many of them are.
Instead of accepting whose fault it truly was and mourning the loss of a young life lost so senselessly over simply not doing what he was told and being out with something he shouldn't have been out with the community instead chooses to blame non-existent factors and everyone and everything else but the real cause of the loss of life.
I should mention there was clear video of what happened via the cop's dashcam. There were also witnesses who collaborated the officer's version of events even if they didn't think he should have fired at all.
Does all this sound familiar?
It should, you could replace the word "Mexican" with "Black" and pretty much describe any number other cases where everything that can be blamed is but not the person who is actually responsible for whatever happened.
It seems the Mexicans have taken the page from the playbook of the blacks and are using it now to blame the cops for actions of their community. This is almost verbatim the blacks usual modus operandi.
In the end we know three things.
A young teen is still dead and that is a huge loss for his friends and family.
A cop's life is forever changed and possibly destroyed over what he HAD to do.
Finally if nothing further happens legally against this officer and for now at least, justice has truly been served for a change, the officer vindicated in a hollow victory.
Pray for the officer and for the family of this boy.
Both need it.
It was a horrible accident brought on by the boy in question but still it is very sad it happened.
What it wasn't was racist, discriminatory or murder as another minority is claiming.
A thirteen year old boy who looked much older, more like an adult, lost his life.
There is no doubt it was horribly tragic and no one wants something like that to happen especially the police officer involved.
This police officer received a call of a man with an assault rifle walking down the street. Upon responding he observed what appeared to be a young adult carrying exactly that, an assault rifle.
He exited his patrol car ordering the subject to drop the weapon repeatedly which the subject did not do.
Instead the subject turned towards the officer raising the weapon at the officer at which time the officer discharged his service weapon.
The assault weapon in question was an AK-47 assault rifle. The officer was a twenty year weapons expert and weapons training officer who identified the weapon in the subject's hands and once it was raised towards him fired in self defense.
This week the district attorney after a thorough investigation held a press conference where she announced the facts of the case and the determination of her office regarding the officer's conduct.
It turned out the young adult while looking much older was only thirteen years old. The second thing was the AK-47 assault rifle was a replica BB gun not a real bullet firing one.
Two pictures were up in the press conference, one showing the young man's weapon and the other a real AK-47.
Both looked exactly alike. No differences at all. The exact same in appearance.
The second was that the evidence clearly showed the officer fired in self-defense based on the information he had available to him at the time of the shooting.
The conclusion was that this was clearly a use of justified force and a clear case of firing in self defense.
The prosecutor stated no charges would be filed since the officer did not do anything wrong. She also stated that the state attorney general's office would not be filing any charges either as this was a justified use of force.
Justice in this case was finally served when in recent years far too many officers have been thrown under the bus in the name of political correctness and appeasement towards minority groups.
With the above said, its still a tragic event. Its something the officer will never recover from even if he returns to work. Not only has he been forced to take a life but he's taken the life of a child.
There is no getting over that, any of it. Its an officer's worst nightmare. I can remember training based on real life scenarios where an officer went into a house to search it and saw a shadow on a wall with a hand holding a gun. The officer in real life had turned and fired, killing the subject only to find out he'd just shot a little boy with a toy gun.
The scenario was fake and for training but it had happened to a police officer before. That was why it was there. It had happened in different ways many times.
Its not something that you want to contemplate but have to so you hopefully don't end up in a similar situation as this Santa Rosa officer did.
What makes this even more tragic is that when it happened the Mexicans went ballistic out there. They started screaming racism, discrimination, murder, and a host of other baseless charges at the officer and his department.
They held protests and marches about the officer and the department for which he worked. They said it was first degree murder, it was because the officer was racist and hated Mexicans, they said the murder happened because the department and its officers hated Mexicans.
They said a lot of things like always get said but what they didn't say was it was because a young man took a real looking gun out with him and pointed it at a police officer after not listening to orders to drop the weapon over and over again.
Maybe the anger should be directed at a teenager not doing what he was told instead. If he had he'd be alive. Maybe the anger should be directed at the fact he was allowed out of the house with a 100% real looking assault rifle to walk down the street with. If he hadn't been he would be alive. Maybe the anger should have been directed a number of places other than where it was but it wasn't.
Instead.another minority group wanted to scapegoat the cops and blame a police officer for another's actions.
While the officer will live with this for the rest of his life, he should be the one who is angry because if the young man hadn't did these things the shooting would never have happened. Yet I can bet the officer isn't angry, isn't furious that he was put in that horrific position but instead incredibly sad and horrified by what happened.
In the aftermath the Mexicans demanded the FBI investigate the racist murder of this young man even though it wasn't. The Mexicans demanded the Justice Dept. investigate the cop and department on civil rights charges even though none were violated.
The Mexicans, of course, demanded the prosecution and jailing of the officer in this case by the district attorney or some other agency.
Once the report came out from the district attorney's office showing clearly that the officer acted in justifiable self defense one would think it would be over but of course its not.
The Mexicans are protesting the decision and making continued demands for the arrest and prosecution of the murderer of this boy.
They are still marching and protesting the racist cop, department and apparently everyone else.
The FBI is unbelievably investigating this and so is the justice department. For what reason I have no idea but its not the first time either one have jumped into things they shouldn't. I believe there is also a law suit going on as well. I think its based on the ridiculous civil rights violation claim as many of them are.
Instead of accepting whose fault it truly was and mourning the loss of a young life lost so senselessly over simply not doing what he was told and being out with something he shouldn't have been out with the community instead chooses to blame non-existent factors and everyone and everything else but the real cause of the loss of life.
I should mention there was clear video of what happened via the cop's dashcam. There were also witnesses who collaborated the officer's version of events even if they didn't think he should have fired at all.
Does all this sound familiar?
It should, you could replace the word "Mexican" with "Black" and pretty much describe any number other cases where everything that can be blamed is but not the person who is actually responsible for whatever happened.
It seems the Mexicans have taken the page from the playbook of the blacks and are using it now to blame the cops for actions of their community. This is almost verbatim the blacks usual modus operandi.
In the end we know three things.
A young teen is still dead and that is a huge loss for his friends and family.
A cop's life is forever changed and possibly destroyed over what he HAD to do.
Finally if nothing further happens legally against this officer and for now at least, justice has truly been served for a change, the officer vindicated in a hollow victory.
Pray for the officer and for the family of this boy.
Both need it.
Thursday, July 10, 2014
Buzz Word of the day
I know its been used before but today it seems to be everywhere.
I can't tell you the number of times Brian Williams used it or one of the reporters today on the evening news.
"Humanitarian Crisis" is the word.
Everything relating to the invasion was "Humanitarian Crisis" over and over again.
"Illegals" of course wasn't used but neither were other phrases such as "Undocumented" "Migrants" "Immigrants" or any of the ones showing up lately.
It was all "HC" all night when referring to the invaders or invasion.
Another attempt to change the truth into what they want you to think about events.
Smoke and mirrors. That is all it is. They've also been pushing in television and print the whole "Little children and mommies" narrative again or still.
Suddenly there aren't any pictures of the sixteen and seventeen year olds invading our shores just the "Little kids and mommies" which actually make up a small percentage of the total.
The vast numbers of teenage border violators is being downplayed because it looks bad to be shilling for them while shilling for mommie and the little angels is a much more beneficial story to be foisting off on the American people.
Then again "HC" is a much more beneficial story than the truth too.
Oh and the UN is apparently getting involved or has been involved in this too.
Surprise, surprise....
Lock and load!
Fight back or go down, that's our choice.
I can't tell you the number of times Brian Williams used it or one of the reporters today on the evening news.
"Humanitarian Crisis" is the word.
Everything relating to the invasion was "Humanitarian Crisis" over and over again.
"Illegals" of course wasn't used but neither were other phrases such as "Undocumented" "Migrants" "Immigrants" or any of the ones showing up lately.
It was all "HC" all night when referring to the invaders or invasion.
Another attempt to change the truth into what they want you to think about events.
Smoke and mirrors. That is all it is. They've also been pushing in television and print the whole "Little children and mommies" narrative again or still.
Suddenly there aren't any pictures of the sixteen and seventeen year olds invading our shores just the "Little kids and mommies" which actually make up a small percentage of the total.
The vast numbers of teenage border violators is being downplayed because it looks bad to be shilling for them while shilling for mommie and the little angels is a much more beneficial story to be foisting off on the American people.
Then again "HC" is a much more beneficial story than the truth too.
Oh and the UN is apparently getting involved or has been involved in this too.
Surprise, surprise....
Lock and load!
Fight back or go down, that's our choice.
Wednesday, July 9, 2014
Rueben Navarette and the illegals invading, Israel, and Detroit, plus court rules again for illegals.
Another sad day today.
A Federal court of appeals has ruled that Arizona must give driver's licenses to illegals.
How can our courts continually make these rulings?
I mean I know its the 9th circuit and they've always been a bunch of whackos but still. Its just another affront to the rule of law being conducted by our government and supported more than not by our courts.
Hey I've got an idea. Arizona can say sure come on down and apply for a license and every single one of the GD illegals showing up and applying for one can be arrested and shoved back across the border where they belong.
How about that?
A simple and great way to round them up.
In another story I saw today President Obama et.al. are going around trying to diffuse the growing anger about the invasion by saying most all of the women and children will end up deported and not allowed to stay in the United States.
Wow!
It took me a while to stop laughing.
If you believe that one I have some swampland in Florida to sell you.
Let me be blunt here. Since the liberals meaning the Prez and all want them here and do NOT want to do anything like deport them this is just more obfuscation to appease the growing angry people of this country. Smoke and mirrors, calm the angry right wingers, shut em up and all the while keep the illegals coming. Once they get settled in of course we can't possibly send them back into poverty etc. can we?
The President and liberals have absolutely no intention of doing any such thing as sending them back or they'd already be on the friggin bus. Hell if they can charter jumbo jets to fly them all over the United States they can sure as hell charter them to fly them back to whatever dismal cesspool they crawled out of.
You don't see that happening do you?
Heck you don't even see buses being chartered to send them back so what makes you think once they're all settled and comfy its going to happen, if they can even find them which they can't by the way, not that they want to.
Its not.
And Ruben Navarette has a column on CNN calling for US Marshals service to be sent to Murrieta Calif to attack the people standing up against the invasion of our country and calls for them to be suppressed and arrested for doing it.
Maybe Mr. Navarette should instead be calling for someone to be sent to arrest and deport the mass of illegal invaders which are showing up in places like Murrieta.
But of course he's not doing that is he?
No instead he has a problem with people protesting and standing up for our country against the invasion force and the government's complicity in it.
That and he and his liberal friends don't want it seen that there is any opposition to the invasion which he is wholly in favor of.
Shame on you Mr. Navarette.
Israel is once again under attack by the Arab terrorists who have vowed to wipe them from the face of the Earth.
The Palestinian terrorists are not only attacking into the heart of Israel but once again celebrating the attacks en mass and calling for the killing of all Israeli's wherever they can be found including especially civilians.
When is Israel just going to go in and wipe the floor with them and be done with it? Bomb them back into the stone age and then take over the territory and tell them they can either live with it or get the hell out.
They have to do something sooner or later.
The Obama administration has abandoned Israel and attacks them every chance it gets. It has been for a long time now. They are basically on their own and someone somewhere has to ask how much more are these people supposed to put up with.
How much more must Israel endure to appease others while these monsters attack them and kill them and their children. How much more must Israel sit back and do nothing while these terrorists call for killing Israel's children before Israel has the right to stand up and say enough?
How much?
I say its way past enough and has been for years. The terrorists want a war Israel will give them one they'll never forget and I hope they do. Deal with them once and for all and never have to worry again.
If Israel doesn't it sure would be nice if our government told the illegal masses to get the hell out but of course nobody has the cujones to do that.
And Detroit is back in my sights after seeing the representative of "Welfare Rights" having a fit about a reporter reporting somewhat accurately about the blacks and the water bill problem.
First of all when did "Welfare" become a right that anyone has?
I'm sure the liberals would like to make it one but I wasn't aware that they had succeeded or that it was one.
Welfare rights indeed.
How about you have the right to the same treatment as every other American and if you don't like it go pi$$ up a rope. I for one am so sick and tired of listening to their whining. If America is so bad as they continually claim there is a lot of real estate in Africa that is open, go get you some.
The reporter actually was more on the side of the blacks which was her side than not but she still attacked him for reporting any of the ugly truths that she didn't like being out there.
As an example of the biggest one she went ballistic about the fact that so many who have their water cut off then promptly show up at the water company and guess what?
They pay the bill.
She didn't want that out there being reported.
This puts to the lie the claim that its mainly if not all about poor people who can't afford their water bill. They find the money fast enough once it gets shut off that's for sure.
Which by the way in case you didn't realize it is why the water company is shutting off the water in the first place. They know these people and they know their games.
They know as soon as they shut off the water the money will magically appear to pay the bill. Of course it comes with a lot of bitching and moaning but the money does come.
Are there people who can't pay the bill? Yes there are but they are not the majority here. Its what it always has been its those who can and don't.
I know I've put off paying a bill as long as I can before to usually pay something else but like the residents of Detroit once whatever it is gets shut off I show up with money to take care of it. I sure as hell don't go crying racial discrimination because I don't have the money or more to the point because I chose not to pay the bill when I should have.
The water dept. knows this as well and miraculously it is working the same with them and most of the residents in question.
That's another thing, why is expecting blacks to do what is expected of every other American considered racist? I mean that is what is being said here.
Expecting them to pay their water bill to have water turned on is being called discriminatory and racist. That is what the liberals are saying.
Why is it though?
If it was just this one instance I wouldn't do more than laugh but its all the time. Anything comes up that any other American would be subject to it becomes a racist thing when it involves blacks.
Expect them to obey the law, its racist/discriminatory.
Expect their children to obey the rules in school, its racist/discriminatory.
Expect them to pay their water bill, its racist/discriminatory.
Expect them to do anything you and I, the average non black American have to do and its called racist and discriminatory.
What in the world is up with that?
More to the point why aren't more people standing up and saying no to the characterization that it is?
Instead we're supposed buy into it all and excuse their behavior, bad behavior mostly at that, and allow it for some strange liberal reason.
I just don't get it just like their demands the media not portray crime on the news involving them because its racist and discriminatory since most crime in some areas is comprised of nothing but blacks.
The two things in common here is that liberals in both instances don't want attention to be drawn to anything besides the "Facts" they want out there.
It doesn't look good if anyone is against the invasion. It doesn't look good to show these blacks for what many of them are. It screws with their narrative and now for Mr. Navarette to call US agents to descend upon those against the invasion and silence them I think is too far.
My final thoughts are this.
Mr. Navarette has called for five hundred US Marshals to descend and silence those protesting the invasion of America in their town. He's called for them to protect the invaders and ensure they get free access to the community and anything else they want. He calls for them to make sure the illegals are not made to feel unwelcome by horrible Americans who can see this for what it is.
He compares it to desegregation in the South in the 60s and calls for the 60s to come again in relation to sending Federal agents in to enforce the "Rights" of the illegals to invade our country.
How about this? How about if he gets his way and five hundred agents come in with their guns and try to intimidate American citizens in favor of illegal aliens. But how about a thousand, or two thousand American citizens show up too with their guns and show the agents we're not going to take this crap on our own soil.
How about that?
It worked in Nevada when federal agents went after an old man and his ranch it should work even better here.
It used to be asked if you would die for your country and if you were patriotic there was only one answer. I wonder if there are enough left that feel that way to answer the only choice, for it may come to that.
I've said it before, this invasion must be fought and it must be fought on the very simple and accurate premise that this is an invasion by masses of people who are crossing our borders to overwhelm us and take over our country. Its been going on for many years and its only getting worse.
Something must be done about it. The invaders must be fought and turned back.
Its that simple folks, stop the invaders. Turn them back or take them down but put a stop to it one way or the other.
I wonder if anyone will do it or more specifically if enough will do it. Having one or two people is not going to be effective or stem the tide. Having hundreds if not thousands of armed citizens show up for the fight and prosecuting the war against the invaders would be a good start.
So far I'm not impressed with the militias who are going out of their way to say they aren't going to do anything except stand around and look like idiots turning over the invaders to CBP while giving them food and water.
They are calling for no violence and of course the illegals want to be turned over these days so they can get "Permisso" from the government.
What they think they can do if they're not willing to fight the invaders I don't know but I'm sure they'll manage the "Idiot" look just fine.
I've been working on a piece about them or at least some comments about them and as I say in my post that isn't up yet. They all look and act like a bunch of yahoos and not much else.
This is a war people and its always been a war. I can remember back when I was a kid in the 70s the Mexicans used to say we won't fight you to get this country back we'll just outbreed you to win. They have always seen a large part of the SW as part of Mexico illegally taken away from them. They have always wanted it back. They're getting it.
Guess what they've done? Between illegals overrunning our borders and massive breeding they've done exactly that.
I don't know that its not too late already and frankly I fear it might well be. There just doesn't seem any will to get rid of the invading force which is already here numbering twelve million odd illegals and I certainly haven't seen much in the way of resolve about getting rid of the masses currently coming. (Mostly teens contrary to the media narrative)
Unless Americans are willing to fight this war and fight it hard we will lose. We will lose our country, our language, our customs, our beliefs, our schools, medical and everything else.
Its already happened in California and happened a long time ago. Its been happening elsewhere as well and its been happening and ongoing across the country now.
So people either need to fight or they need to just give up and we'll call this the United States of Mexico North. And we can all go down to the border and welcome them with open arms as our traitorous President has been and is doing.
Oh and Mr. Navarette, since you love the illegals so damn much why don't you go back to Mexico with them if we ever deport them which I certainly hope will get done.
Hell why don't you just go back to Mexico anyway and spew your anti-American bull$ht there where it might be appreciated more.
I want to hope something will be done but I'm more afraid it won't.
Please prove me wrong......
A Federal court of appeals has ruled that Arizona must give driver's licenses to illegals.
How can our courts continually make these rulings?
I mean I know its the 9th circuit and they've always been a bunch of whackos but still. Its just another affront to the rule of law being conducted by our government and supported more than not by our courts.
Hey I've got an idea. Arizona can say sure come on down and apply for a license and every single one of the GD illegals showing up and applying for one can be arrested and shoved back across the border where they belong.
How about that?
A simple and great way to round them up.
In another story I saw today President Obama et.al. are going around trying to diffuse the growing anger about the invasion by saying most all of the women and children will end up deported and not allowed to stay in the United States.
Wow!
It took me a while to stop laughing.
If you believe that one I have some swampland in Florida to sell you.
Let me be blunt here. Since the liberals meaning the Prez and all want them here and do NOT want to do anything like deport them this is just more obfuscation to appease the growing angry people of this country. Smoke and mirrors, calm the angry right wingers, shut em up and all the while keep the illegals coming. Once they get settled in of course we can't possibly send them back into poverty etc. can we?
The President and liberals have absolutely no intention of doing any such thing as sending them back or they'd already be on the friggin bus. Hell if they can charter jumbo jets to fly them all over the United States they can sure as hell charter them to fly them back to whatever dismal cesspool they crawled out of.
You don't see that happening do you?
Heck you don't even see buses being chartered to send them back so what makes you think once they're all settled and comfy its going to happen, if they can even find them which they can't by the way, not that they want to.
Its not.
And Ruben Navarette has a column on CNN calling for US Marshals service to be sent to Murrieta Calif to attack the people standing up against the invasion of our country and calls for them to be suppressed and arrested for doing it.
Maybe Mr. Navarette should instead be calling for someone to be sent to arrest and deport the mass of illegal invaders which are showing up in places like Murrieta.
But of course he's not doing that is he?
No instead he has a problem with people protesting and standing up for our country against the invasion force and the government's complicity in it.
That and he and his liberal friends don't want it seen that there is any opposition to the invasion which he is wholly in favor of.
Shame on you Mr. Navarette.
Israel is once again under attack by the Arab terrorists who have vowed to wipe them from the face of the Earth.
The Palestinian terrorists are not only attacking into the heart of Israel but once again celebrating the attacks en mass and calling for the killing of all Israeli's wherever they can be found including especially civilians.
When is Israel just going to go in and wipe the floor with them and be done with it? Bomb them back into the stone age and then take over the territory and tell them they can either live with it or get the hell out.
They have to do something sooner or later.
The Obama administration has abandoned Israel and attacks them every chance it gets. It has been for a long time now. They are basically on their own and someone somewhere has to ask how much more are these people supposed to put up with.
How much more must Israel endure to appease others while these monsters attack them and kill them and their children. How much more must Israel sit back and do nothing while these terrorists call for killing Israel's children before Israel has the right to stand up and say enough?
How much?
I say its way past enough and has been for years. The terrorists want a war Israel will give them one they'll never forget and I hope they do. Deal with them once and for all and never have to worry again.
If Israel doesn't it sure would be nice if our government told the illegal masses to get the hell out but of course nobody has the cujones to do that.
And Detroit is back in my sights after seeing the representative of "Welfare Rights" having a fit about a reporter reporting somewhat accurately about the blacks and the water bill problem.
First of all when did "Welfare" become a right that anyone has?
I'm sure the liberals would like to make it one but I wasn't aware that they had succeeded or that it was one.
Welfare rights indeed.
How about you have the right to the same treatment as every other American and if you don't like it go pi$$ up a rope. I for one am so sick and tired of listening to their whining. If America is so bad as they continually claim there is a lot of real estate in Africa that is open, go get you some.
The reporter actually was more on the side of the blacks which was her side than not but she still attacked him for reporting any of the ugly truths that she didn't like being out there.
As an example of the biggest one she went ballistic about the fact that so many who have their water cut off then promptly show up at the water company and guess what?
They pay the bill.
She didn't want that out there being reported.
This puts to the lie the claim that its mainly if not all about poor people who can't afford their water bill. They find the money fast enough once it gets shut off that's for sure.
Which by the way in case you didn't realize it is why the water company is shutting off the water in the first place. They know these people and they know their games.
They know as soon as they shut off the water the money will magically appear to pay the bill. Of course it comes with a lot of bitching and moaning but the money does come.
Are there people who can't pay the bill? Yes there are but they are not the majority here. Its what it always has been its those who can and don't.
I know I've put off paying a bill as long as I can before to usually pay something else but like the residents of Detroit once whatever it is gets shut off I show up with money to take care of it. I sure as hell don't go crying racial discrimination because I don't have the money or more to the point because I chose not to pay the bill when I should have.
The water dept. knows this as well and miraculously it is working the same with them and most of the residents in question.
That's another thing, why is expecting blacks to do what is expected of every other American considered racist? I mean that is what is being said here.
Expecting them to pay their water bill to have water turned on is being called discriminatory and racist. That is what the liberals are saying.
Why is it though?
If it was just this one instance I wouldn't do more than laugh but its all the time. Anything comes up that any other American would be subject to it becomes a racist thing when it involves blacks.
Expect them to obey the law, its racist/discriminatory.
Expect their children to obey the rules in school, its racist/discriminatory.
Expect them to pay their water bill, its racist/discriminatory.
Expect them to do anything you and I, the average non black American have to do and its called racist and discriminatory.
What in the world is up with that?
More to the point why aren't more people standing up and saying no to the characterization that it is?
Instead we're supposed buy into it all and excuse their behavior, bad behavior mostly at that, and allow it for some strange liberal reason.
I just don't get it just like their demands the media not portray crime on the news involving them because its racist and discriminatory since most crime in some areas is comprised of nothing but blacks.
The two things in common here is that liberals in both instances don't want attention to be drawn to anything besides the "Facts" they want out there.
It doesn't look good if anyone is against the invasion. It doesn't look good to show these blacks for what many of them are. It screws with their narrative and now for Mr. Navarette to call US agents to descend upon those against the invasion and silence them I think is too far.
My final thoughts are this.
Mr. Navarette has called for five hundred US Marshals to descend and silence those protesting the invasion of America in their town. He's called for them to protect the invaders and ensure they get free access to the community and anything else they want. He calls for them to make sure the illegals are not made to feel unwelcome by horrible Americans who can see this for what it is.
He compares it to desegregation in the South in the 60s and calls for the 60s to come again in relation to sending Federal agents in to enforce the "Rights" of the illegals to invade our country.
How about this? How about if he gets his way and five hundred agents come in with their guns and try to intimidate American citizens in favor of illegal aliens. But how about a thousand, or two thousand American citizens show up too with their guns and show the agents we're not going to take this crap on our own soil.
How about that?
It worked in Nevada when federal agents went after an old man and his ranch it should work even better here.
It used to be asked if you would die for your country and if you were patriotic there was only one answer. I wonder if there are enough left that feel that way to answer the only choice, for it may come to that.
I've said it before, this invasion must be fought and it must be fought on the very simple and accurate premise that this is an invasion by masses of people who are crossing our borders to overwhelm us and take over our country. Its been going on for many years and its only getting worse.
Something must be done about it. The invaders must be fought and turned back.
Its that simple folks, stop the invaders. Turn them back or take them down but put a stop to it one way or the other.
I wonder if anyone will do it or more specifically if enough will do it. Having one or two people is not going to be effective or stem the tide. Having hundreds if not thousands of armed citizens show up for the fight and prosecuting the war against the invaders would be a good start.
So far I'm not impressed with the militias who are going out of their way to say they aren't going to do anything except stand around and look like idiots turning over the invaders to CBP while giving them food and water.
They are calling for no violence and of course the illegals want to be turned over these days so they can get "Permisso" from the government.
What they think they can do if they're not willing to fight the invaders I don't know but I'm sure they'll manage the "Idiot" look just fine.
I've been working on a piece about them or at least some comments about them and as I say in my post that isn't up yet. They all look and act like a bunch of yahoos and not much else.
This is a war people and its always been a war. I can remember back when I was a kid in the 70s the Mexicans used to say we won't fight you to get this country back we'll just outbreed you to win. They have always seen a large part of the SW as part of Mexico illegally taken away from them. They have always wanted it back. They're getting it.
Guess what they've done? Between illegals overrunning our borders and massive breeding they've done exactly that.
I don't know that its not too late already and frankly I fear it might well be. There just doesn't seem any will to get rid of the invading force which is already here numbering twelve million odd illegals and I certainly haven't seen much in the way of resolve about getting rid of the masses currently coming. (Mostly teens contrary to the media narrative)
Unless Americans are willing to fight this war and fight it hard we will lose. We will lose our country, our language, our customs, our beliefs, our schools, medical and everything else.
Its already happened in California and happened a long time ago. Its been happening elsewhere as well and its been happening and ongoing across the country now.
So people either need to fight or they need to just give up and we'll call this the United States of Mexico North. And we can all go down to the border and welcome them with open arms as our traitorous President has been and is doing.
Oh and Mr. Navarette, since you love the illegals so damn much why don't you go back to Mexico with them if we ever deport them which I certainly hope will get done.
Hell why don't you just go back to Mexico anyway and spew your anti-American bull$ht there where it might be appreciated more.
I want to hope something will be done but I'm more afraid it won't.
Please prove me wrong......
Monday, July 7, 2014
The War On.....Take your pick
The war on....women, undocumented, minorities, reproductive choice etc.
These aren't new phrases by and large. They just come and go as being used by the liberals and democrats.
This last week its been on again. There is a war on all these and more.
Except there isn't.
Not that you'd know it from listening to the news media. The way the portray events, slant events and outright twist events to further the liberal beliefs is beyond belief.
Let's take it one at a time where practical.
The war on women that doesn't exist.
There has been a plethora of the use of this phrase this last week or so. Backed by the media in full describing events as taking away a woman's choice, reproductive freedom, healthcare choices, and a few others this and the "War on women's health, war on women's reproductive freedom, war on reproductive choice, and the war on a women's healthcare choices amongst others.
All of it is a bunch of bullshit.
Listening to the liberals and media you would think the Supreme Court (SC) issued a decision which took that away from women.
They didn't.
What they won't tell you and don't want you to know is that there has been nothing done and nothing, outside of abortion, proposed that would be taking away anything and certainly not any of what they are claiming. A women still has the same rights and availability of options, the same choices she had the day before the SC decision.
That's right, absolutely nothing has changed on anything they are claiming has changed. Nothing!
The SC decision said those with religious beliefs in conflict with the government's mandate don't have to partake of it. They don't have to pay for it. That's it, a woman can do whatever she wants, take whatever drugs or other methods she wants to take but some employers don't have to pay for it.
The whole issue isn't about any of the crap the liberals claim it is. Its about who is going to pay for these woman to do what they want.
That's all its about and all its ever been about.
Money.
Does a woman have the right today to take a morning after pill.
The answer is a resounding yes!
Today though some companies whose owners do not believe in abortion don't have to pay for it.
Simple as that.
Like Sandra Fluke and the Rush controversy which occurred the liberals bring up a bunch of BS to obfuscate the truth of the matter.
All Rush was trying to say was why should we pay for her to sleep around? That's it and its a legitimate question. The second part of that question was why should a religious university be required to go against their beliefs and pay for her to sleep around as she chooses?
Neither he or anyone else said she can't sleep around or can't get contraceptives to do it.
All they said was why should we or a religious institution who doesn't believe in it have to pay for her social life whether with one person or twenty?
That is a good question and certainly a valid one.
Instead mass liberal hysteria came out attacking Mr. Limbaugh for saying it and completely burying the issue which is as valid today as it was then.
There is no war on women or anything related to their health or healthcare. Its all a fake narrative to win votes and attempt to scare people into the democratic arms.
Unless you count abortion as a war on women and I'm sure the liberals do, there is no war.
The republicans have not and are not waging a war at all. I for one don't care who is sleeping with who or how many. I don't care what kind of contraceptives they are using in the slightest. That's their business.
Other than abortion I've never heard anyone realistically calling for anything like what the liberals claim. No one cares what a woman is doing or using.
The issue is who gets to pay for it and yes there has been debate about whether the woman should pay for her own stuff or everyone else should do so.
I look at it this way. If I am going to have sex I don't think its anybody else's job to buy the raincoat but me. Liberals think the government ought to be buying them.
But this case wasn't even about that. It was about a religious company being required to go against their beliefs and pay for it.
The women can still get it they just won't have it bought for them at that company.
So that's the not-war on women.
Now we can go into the "War on the undocumented and minorities"
Lets get something straight there is again no war. There should be but there isn't.
The "Illegals" which the liberals want to call "Undocumented" to try to hide the illegality of their existence don't belong in this country, period.
They should be sent home immediately and the invasion stopped.
Instead anyone against them is called racist, inhumane and perpetrating a war on the undocumented/minorities.
It should be mentioned that this war has been extended under the umbrella of "War on minorities" in an effort to tie them together with the underlying theory that its all tied to race as in we're racists and that's why we oppose the illegal invasion of our country.
Even though its been shown that the majority of the invasion force consists of older teenagers the media continues to portray them as little children and their mommies. I can't even quantify the number of times I've heard the "Young children and their mothers" in news broadcasts over the last week or so.
The people in Murrieta have been painted as merciless, inhumane, racist, mean people who have been attacking buses filled with mothers and their young children. That is one example.
I've heard reference that anyone opposing the invasion is racist, mean spirited, inhumane, insensitive, uncaring, and a host of other pejoratives attacking them.
None of it is true. The fact that the media is jumping on this bandwagon is very concerning and troubling. There is certainly no impartiality here. They ignore anything showing a negative light and focus on these little children desperately seeking a more prosperous life.
That would be a great heartbreaking story if its true.
Its not.
Then there is the war on minorities.
What this boils down to is that anything against the liberal left idea of the way things should be with minorities constitutes a war on them.
They don't want the illegals deported so anyone calling for it makes it a war on them. They don't want them to abide by our laws so anyone calling for it makes it a war on them. This goes farther than just the illegals though as this non-existent war also extends to blacks.
Enforce discipline in the schools and its racist. Enforce the laws on blacks as well as everyone else and its racist. And now expecting blacks to pay their water bill is racist and a war on minorities.
According to these people anything that affects blacks more than whites is not only racist but part of the white war on minorities.
This of course doesn't take into account such things as there not being any whites in an area which accounts for mostly blacks being affected. In the water case its Detroit which is almost entirely black.
The liberals point to the fact that its affecting mostly black people as evidence that its racist and this is the way it gets reported in the media as well. They just don't mention its mostly blacks because there ain't no whites left to affect in that $hithole.
So now they've demanded the UN of all things come in and force the city to provide free water to all blacks in the city and make certain the residents there don't have to pay their water bills.
I'd laugh except so many including our federal government are taking this very seriously and instead of telling the UN to kiss off they are groveling to them.
This is scary people. Very scary. The United Nations is coming into our country and saying that getting free water is a fundamental human right and Detroit is violating UN laws by demanding payment and shutting off the water to those who don't pay the bill.
Our government instead of telling the UN to stick it is instead addressing its concerns with the city of Detroit to get water given to these blacks.
This is a hugely dangerous precedent to set. I have to pay my water bill. If I don't I get my water shut off. Its that simple. If I want my water back on I have to pay my past due balance and they turn it back on.
Yet if you're black in Detroit this is unacceptable and Detroit is expected to let the blacks get away with not paying? What is wrong with that picture?
Why is the media jumping in on this on the side of the whiners and complainers rather than saying "Why don't you pay your bill then?"
I wonder what else will be next. The right to have a home? The right to have electricity? The right to have a car? The right to have a telephone?
I know already the UN considers it a fundamental human right that everyone is entitled to have internet and internet access which means they must have the right to an internet accessing device of some kind.
Where does it end? The liberals think the government should pay for everything and no one should have less than any other. Now its nice to think the government should buy you a mansion in the Hollywood hills and a Lexus to drive around in and free everything else but that is not America.
Is it fun to struggle and not have, no its not. But that is life. The idea the blacks should have everything given to them is nothing new, what is new is the movement to see that happen.
That is exactly what is happening in Detroit right now. They are demanding the blacks be given free water service as a basic fundamental human right. If this succeeds it will be only the beginning not the end.
This has been a long term agenda of the liberals and blacks that has existed for a very long time.
So there isn't a war on minorities but maybe there should be.......
Bottom line here is that people need to start looking at what is being fed to them, twisted and slanted for their consumption and not believe a word of it.
The war isn't there although I think in some instances that maybe a war would be a good idea.
We definitely need a war on the illegals to stop the invasion of our country.
Another sad piece of news today I heard is that the LAPD is joining other law enforcement in California in not complying with federal law by holding illegals when captured for criminal acts. A long time bastion of liberal nonsense this is just the latest blow to getting rid of these people and actually enforcing our laws.
The fact law enforcement agencies are aiding and abetting illegals in staying here illegally when they have committed crimes is very depressing and a sad commentary on where we are as a society.
So the war that wasn't goes on with the complicity of the media and more the people who allow it.
Everyone is hoping for change come November when Republicans come into power but I just don't think its going to happen. Oh they might very well win, matter of fact I think they will, but I don't think what is elected with do anything they should.
The wrong kind of Republicans are being elected. Instead of conservative ones we'll be getting a bunch of democrat lite in office.
I'm glad I'm getting older, I just hope I won't live long enough to see where this country is headed. Its not some place I would want to live in I can tell you that. I know that's sad and probably not politically correct to say but its the truth.
Reading today the government in the UK castigated the BBC for actually reporting the joke the whole climate change thing is and ordering them to essentially stop putting on air any opposing views is just another bit of icing on the cake of where we're all going.
We'll just have to see if people wake up but the question begs if they do will it be enough to do anything? Or will it be a case of way too little, way too late.
Sorry, being pessimistic today I suppose. But the news isn't encouraging.
These aren't new phrases by and large. They just come and go as being used by the liberals and democrats.
This last week its been on again. There is a war on all these and more.
Except there isn't.
Not that you'd know it from listening to the news media. The way the portray events, slant events and outright twist events to further the liberal beliefs is beyond belief.
Let's take it one at a time where practical.
The war on women that doesn't exist.
There has been a plethora of the use of this phrase this last week or so. Backed by the media in full describing events as taking away a woman's choice, reproductive freedom, healthcare choices, and a few others this and the "War on women's health, war on women's reproductive freedom, war on reproductive choice, and the war on a women's healthcare choices amongst others.
All of it is a bunch of bullshit.
Listening to the liberals and media you would think the Supreme Court (SC) issued a decision which took that away from women.
They didn't.
What they won't tell you and don't want you to know is that there has been nothing done and nothing, outside of abortion, proposed that would be taking away anything and certainly not any of what they are claiming. A women still has the same rights and availability of options, the same choices she had the day before the SC decision.
That's right, absolutely nothing has changed on anything they are claiming has changed. Nothing!
The SC decision said those with religious beliefs in conflict with the government's mandate don't have to partake of it. They don't have to pay for it. That's it, a woman can do whatever she wants, take whatever drugs or other methods she wants to take but some employers don't have to pay for it.
The whole issue isn't about any of the crap the liberals claim it is. Its about who is going to pay for these woman to do what they want.
That's all its about and all its ever been about.
Money.
Does a woman have the right today to take a morning after pill.
The answer is a resounding yes!
Today though some companies whose owners do not believe in abortion don't have to pay for it.
Simple as that.
Like Sandra Fluke and the Rush controversy which occurred the liberals bring up a bunch of BS to obfuscate the truth of the matter.
All Rush was trying to say was why should we pay for her to sleep around? That's it and its a legitimate question. The second part of that question was why should a religious university be required to go against their beliefs and pay for her to sleep around as she chooses?
Neither he or anyone else said she can't sleep around or can't get contraceptives to do it.
All they said was why should we or a religious institution who doesn't believe in it have to pay for her social life whether with one person or twenty?
That is a good question and certainly a valid one.
Instead mass liberal hysteria came out attacking Mr. Limbaugh for saying it and completely burying the issue which is as valid today as it was then.
There is no war on women or anything related to their health or healthcare. Its all a fake narrative to win votes and attempt to scare people into the democratic arms.
Unless you count abortion as a war on women and I'm sure the liberals do, there is no war.
The republicans have not and are not waging a war at all. I for one don't care who is sleeping with who or how many. I don't care what kind of contraceptives they are using in the slightest. That's their business.
Other than abortion I've never heard anyone realistically calling for anything like what the liberals claim. No one cares what a woman is doing or using.
The issue is who gets to pay for it and yes there has been debate about whether the woman should pay for her own stuff or everyone else should do so.
I look at it this way. If I am going to have sex I don't think its anybody else's job to buy the raincoat but me. Liberals think the government ought to be buying them.
But this case wasn't even about that. It was about a religious company being required to go against their beliefs and pay for it.
The women can still get it they just won't have it bought for them at that company.
So that's the not-war on women.
Now we can go into the "War on the undocumented and minorities"
Lets get something straight there is again no war. There should be but there isn't.
The "Illegals" which the liberals want to call "Undocumented" to try to hide the illegality of their existence don't belong in this country, period.
They should be sent home immediately and the invasion stopped.
Instead anyone against them is called racist, inhumane and perpetrating a war on the undocumented/minorities.
It should be mentioned that this war has been extended under the umbrella of "War on minorities" in an effort to tie them together with the underlying theory that its all tied to race as in we're racists and that's why we oppose the illegal invasion of our country.
Even though its been shown that the majority of the invasion force consists of older teenagers the media continues to portray them as little children and their mommies. I can't even quantify the number of times I've heard the "Young children and their mothers" in news broadcasts over the last week or so.
The people in Murrieta have been painted as merciless, inhumane, racist, mean people who have been attacking buses filled with mothers and their young children. That is one example.
I've heard reference that anyone opposing the invasion is racist, mean spirited, inhumane, insensitive, uncaring, and a host of other pejoratives attacking them.
None of it is true. The fact that the media is jumping on this bandwagon is very concerning and troubling. There is certainly no impartiality here. They ignore anything showing a negative light and focus on these little children desperately seeking a more prosperous life.
That would be a great heartbreaking story if its true.
Its not.
Then there is the war on minorities.
What this boils down to is that anything against the liberal left idea of the way things should be with minorities constitutes a war on them.
They don't want the illegals deported so anyone calling for it makes it a war on them. They don't want them to abide by our laws so anyone calling for it makes it a war on them. This goes farther than just the illegals though as this non-existent war also extends to blacks.
Enforce discipline in the schools and its racist. Enforce the laws on blacks as well as everyone else and its racist. And now expecting blacks to pay their water bill is racist and a war on minorities.
According to these people anything that affects blacks more than whites is not only racist but part of the white war on minorities.
This of course doesn't take into account such things as there not being any whites in an area which accounts for mostly blacks being affected. In the water case its Detroit which is almost entirely black.
The liberals point to the fact that its affecting mostly black people as evidence that its racist and this is the way it gets reported in the media as well. They just don't mention its mostly blacks because there ain't no whites left to affect in that $hithole.
So now they've demanded the UN of all things come in and force the city to provide free water to all blacks in the city and make certain the residents there don't have to pay their water bills.
I'd laugh except so many including our federal government are taking this very seriously and instead of telling the UN to kiss off they are groveling to them.
This is scary people. Very scary. The United Nations is coming into our country and saying that getting free water is a fundamental human right and Detroit is violating UN laws by demanding payment and shutting off the water to those who don't pay the bill.
Our government instead of telling the UN to stick it is instead addressing its concerns with the city of Detroit to get water given to these blacks.
This is a hugely dangerous precedent to set. I have to pay my water bill. If I don't I get my water shut off. Its that simple. If I want my water back on I have to pay my past due balance and they turn it back on.
Yet if you're black in Detroit this is unacceptable and Detroit is expected to let the blacks get away with not paying? What is wrong with that picture?
Why is the media jumping in on this on the side of the whiners and complainers rather than saying "Why don't you pay your bill then?"
I wonder what else will be next. The right to have a home? The right to have electricity? The right to have a car? The right to have a telephone?
I know already the UN considers it a fundamental human right that everyone is entitled to have internet and internet access which means they must have the right to an internet accessing device of some kind.
Where does it end? The liberals think the government should pay for everything and no one should have less than any other. Now its nice to think the government should buy you a mansion in the Hollywood hills and a Lexus to drive around in and free everything else but that is not America.
Is it fun to struggle and not have, no its not. But that is life. The idea the blacks should have everything given to them is nothing new, what is new is the movement to see that happen.
That is exactly what is happening in Detroit right now. They are demanding the blacks be given free water service as a basic fundamental human right. If this succeeds it will be only the beginning not the end.
This has been a long term agenda of the liberals and blacks that has existed for a very long time.
So there isn't a war on minorities but maybe there should be.......
Bottom line here is that people need to start looking at what is being fed to them, twisted and slanted for their consumption and not believe a word of it.
The war isn't there although I think in some instances that maybe a war would be a good idea.
We definitely need a war on the illegals to stop the invasion of our country.
Another sad piece of news today I heard is that the LAPD is joining other law enforcement in California in not complying with federal law by holding illegals when captured for criminal acts. A long time bastion of liberal nonsense this is just the latest blow to getting rid of these people and actually enforcing our laws.
The fact law enforcement agencies are aiding and abetting illegals in staying here illegally when they have committed crimes is very depressing and a sad commentary on where we are as a society.
So the war that wasn't goes on with the complicity of the media and more the people who allow it.
Everyone is hoping for change come November when Republicans come into power but I just don't think its going to happen. Oh they might very well win, matter of fact I think they will, but I don't think what is elected with do anything they should.
The wrong kind of Republicans are being elected. Instead of conservative ones we'll be getting a bunch of democrat lite in office.
I'm glad I'm getting older, I just hope I won't live long enough to see where this country is headed. Its not some place I would want to live in I can tell you that. I know that's sad and probably not politically correct to say but its the truth.
Reading today the government in the UK castigated the BBC for actually reporting the joke the whole climate change thing is and ordering them to essentially stop putting on air any opposing views is just another bit of icing on the cake of where we're all going.
We'll just have to see if people wake up but the question begs if they do will it be enough to do anything? Or will it be a case of way too little, way too late.
Sorry, being pessimistic today I suppose. But the news isn't encouraging.
Saturday, June 28, 2014
Immigration Part 2
Well it seems last week that a Montana judge ruled a law up there illegal so those in Montana can no longer even check if illegals are there illegally.
Wonder what happened to E-Verify? Apparently in Montana you can't do it any longer.
What exactly have we come to where this is even a question?
My God how can a court rule that the government can't verify citizenship before granting benefits which require citizenship to get?
The other thing I touched upon before and that was allowing the Obama administration to drive the story and the collusion I was seeing from the media in that.
So suddenly this invasion is being really pushed as a "Humanitarian crisis" along our border and of course we must "Help" those suffering said crisis in all ways and manners.
I.E. Don't even think of deporting them.
Nancy Pelosi is going to the region to tour it and meet with these poor children, to see what the US can do for them etc. and the media has jumped on it wholeheartedly.
On top of that we have the first lady of one of the countries who is not only sending these people up here but has told us not to send them back, going around on a tour of the facilities where "Her" people are at to determine if they are being treated right.
What the hell people? Why she wasn't laughed at to her face when she suggested it I don't know.
Oh, wait I do know. Obama et. al. are colluding with her and her husband to instigate and facilitate the invasion. That's why.
Why isn't Nancy Pelosi doing what a US Senator should be doing, which is tour those facilities to determine the best way to repatriate those people in the quickest manner possible?
Hell why aren't any of "Our" so called elected officials doing that?
Instead its all about how to make the invaders' lives easier and how can we further disperse them fully into our country.
Seeing the news today shows Ms. Pelosi is actually down there and this is her thoughts on things.
Nancy Pelosi seemed to indicate how unfortunate it was that a fence divides the community she was speaking in. That fence was the US/Mexican border fence. Apparently she thinks there shouldn't be one. (Surprise, surprise)
She also said we're all Americans and that the American people should see this as an opportunity to help all those who have trespassed upon us.
I couldn't sit through listening to that woman for five plus minutes of BS but what I did hear was disgusting and anti-American. She should be ashamed of herself but then again she never has been.
So once again the Obama administration, this time through good ole Nancy, is advocating against the best interests of our country.
When is someone going to say enough already? When are those supposedly on our side, republicans, going to stand up and say no more?
When?
Not only that but Obama and people representing him have announced that the American people haven't seen anything yet in terms of his "Executive actions"
He along with dem reps have stated in the last few days that he is going to unilaterally dictate immigration via executive order which means further amnesty. They have come right out and said it. No one is calling them on it. Boehner is standing around saying he's thinking of challenging Obama in court over it but instead of whining some more about Obama's illegal actions why don't they do something about them.
Well I'll tell you one thing. The establishment republicans want amnesty almost as much as Obama does. The only problem is they are waiting until they get reelected to do it. You see the Tea party republicans don't want it. They are fighting it but they won't win unless they get elected this fall.
Once again the sheeple are electing the establishment and rejecting the conservative principled candidates. So once again you're going to get a majority establishment base in the Congress and Senate.
Which means nothing positive is going to get done on the issue. Since business and establishment republicans want immigration too they will pass "Reform" giving amnesty to the millions of illegals and we'll be forced to continue to house, feed, care, school and jail them.
Its all a fake out people. Nothing but a smoke and mirrors effort to get elected. Once the establishment republicans get a hold of the Senate and Congress they will make noises about securing our border and then legalize all the ones here already and allow millions more to come. They are not much better than the democrats on this subject. All they are waiting for is the elections to be over to screw us as bad or nearly as bad the democrats would.
Why people can't see these stalling tactics for what they are is mind boggling. None of the establishment republicans want to vote for amnesty before the elections which is why Boehner has been stalling for months in the Congress. But look at what the Senate has done? They voted for amnesty a long time ago. This is what awaits us in the House if the establishment wins.
Think long and hard about that before going into the voting booth.
More of the establishment republican philosophy is not what this country needs.
Matter of fact, more would be a disaster.
Saturday, June 21, 2014
Invasion USA. Obama and Treason, Sheldon Adelson, Rupert Murdoch and the media push to support it all
I've been watching this whole thing with the illegals invading our country for decades. I was going to say the last week or so but its been far longer than that.
This last week or so is only the latest assault upon our borders. This time with collusion by the sitting President and our government.
Thousands upon thousands of illegals are storming our borders, breaching them and invading our country.
The President of this country has not only encouraged this attack upon us but facilitated it. His response to the situation.
Set up more places for them to live, give them bus tickets to further their invasion into the heartland of the country, provide legal representation to keep the invaders here and make sure they don't get sent away. Do everything short of issuing pardons and do not do anything to rid our country of these vermin.
Instead of doing everything possible to prevent and repel the invasion he's done nothing but support it and encourage it. He is helping the invaders come and remain in this country not get rid of them.
The Vice-President has stated they are citizens of this country in his view. Statements have also been made that these enemies of the state are the epitome of what this country is all about and should be allowed to stay. But not only allowed to stay but welcomed and helped in any way possible by our government.
The democrats have jumped on this bandwagon echoing the same sentiments. Calling for supposed "Reform" to accept these invaders and make them US citizens rather than fight vigorously to get rid of them.
The President takes an oath of office to defend this country from enemies foreign and domestic, to faithfully defend the Constitution and protect this land.
He has not done this. The Vice-President has not done this. The Senators and Congressmen of the House and Senate have largely not done this.
Instead he and the others have opened their arms to the invading forces of our country. He has done the exact opposite from defending this country from that invading force. He set up the latest invasion and continues even as it goes on to facilitate said invasion. We have the hordes coming across with a free ride once they get here, bringing with them disease, criminality, lack of education and other problems. These problems will migrate from the border to wherever these people end up. Impacting those local areas, police, fire, ems, schools, jails, welfare, and medical amongst many other negative impacts.
This is called treason. To have a President actively doing what this one is amounts to nothing more than that. This President is not defending this country from enemies foreign or domestic or defending this country from attack. Neither is his government including his Vice-President. Our Congress is not much better ranging from actively supporting the invasion of our shores to just not acting to defend us from said invasion. Democrats and Republicans alike are to blame.
As much as I would like to put the entire blame onto this President and democrats and while there is a huge amount of blame to be placed upon them, there is also blame to be placed squarely on the shoulders of the Republicans.
For some reason the Republicans keep taking a non-committal approach to the issue of amnesty. Talking about reform and other mealy mouthed crap rather than standing up and taking a stand. Even after Cantor lost due to that approach they still make noises of appeasement towards pro-amnesty proponents and even deny the reason for that representative's loss.
In the last couple of days both Sheldon Adelson and Rupert Murdoch, two big Republican supporters, have come out with calls for amnesty and pushing Republicans to pass it. Mr. Adelson even went so far as to say that expecting or even thinking about getting rid of the masses which have invaded our country is ridiculous and not realistic. Basically saying if you think along those lines you must be crazy.
While Obama and his administration are out there telling their planned campaign about violence and fear driving those who have overran our borders and telling America that most people in this country want amnesty for all these illegals, these have been proven to be nothing more than propaganda lies. Just like the story they have put out about why Cantor lost the election. They say it had nothing to do with his pro-immigration stance yet it has been proven to have been all about that stance. People didn't like it and said so with their vote.
Interview after interview with the illegals, with those working with the illegals, and with experts with knowledge of the illegals all have said one thing. Its the same reason as it has always been. Money and benefits. They come because they are poor and have been told, think, or know they can get a much better standard of living here in the US than whatever hovel they originated from.
Violence and fear while existing has been shown NOT to be the primary cause of the invasion. In some instances it is also cited but the primary reason is the same as it was 30 years ago. They talk about better homes, schools, medical care, free stuff, benefits, welfare, food stamps, etc. etc.
This is what drives these people, this is what has always driven these people.
The claim the American people overwhelmingly want amnesty for the invaders is beyond ridiculous. They don't, plain and simple. They may want reform but that reform is to get rid of what is here and prevent more from coming. It sure as hell isn't amnesty.
So in the last few days I find it interesting the media has suddenly been showing human interest stories with one big theme running throughout. The Administration's version of things. CNN had a couple today. One about this seventeen year old who fled solely because of violence and was raped and all the travails she supposedly went through to get here. The other about a like boy and his brother who was brutally murdered in his home country and his travails to get here. The underlying message "How can you want to kick them out now that they've been through so much and finally got here?"
All pushing the violence and fear scenario as put out by Obama et. al.
So even though this President has committed treason by acting against this country's interests, inviting, encouraging, facilitating, aiding and supporting the invasion of our country. Even though he continues to act in a treasonous manner by doing everything he can to help the invading forces in our land and for them to remain here rather than repel them the American people must stand up and fight these actions, these forces, and this administration.
Contrary to what Mr. Adelson and Mr. Murdoch propose, that is the last thing we should be doing. We must not legitimize the invasion of our country by foreign nationals. We must take concrete forceful steps to repel that invasion and get rid of those already here.
Contrary especially to what Mr. Adelson has said it has been proven that if steps are taken to make life here untenable for these hordes they will leave and leave running. It has been done even if it did not get a chance to last long enough.
Arizona before the courts put a stop to it set in motion steps which proved 150% effective in combating the invasion of that state. While those steps were in effect masses and masses of illegals fled that state for other places where the welcome mat had been set out.
It was so bad that California even sued Arizona over the massive influx of illegals which descended upon their state once Arizona's law went into effect. Then again California has always put up signs welcoming illegals with open arms. They just weren't too happy when thousands and thousands suddenly showed up on their doorstep.
I still remember all the interviews with illegals which the media did trying to drum up sympathy and attack Arizona's laws. For me I just laughed at seeing someone finally do something that worked. These people were frightened, they said things like they had no place to go in Arizona, they wouldn't be able to work in Arizona, they basically wouldn't be able to do much of anything in Arizona and they faced capture at every turn and deportation so they were leaving and going other places where they would be able to do all the things Arizona was going to prevent them from doing and where they'd be welcome.
Folks IT WORKED!!!
They fled the state en masse. Imagine what would happen if those laws were put into place on a nationwide basis. Where would they go?
Nowhere in this country.
Imagine all the problems we have related to illegals being in this country. Overcrowded schools, medical systems, courts, prisons, police forces and many more, including the diseases they bring. Now imagine the illegals gone and not having any of those problems.
If effective disincentives to be, remain in or come to this country were put into broad implementation things would change and change quickly with respect to this problem. If there was no place they could go, no place to live, no place to work, no way to feed themselves or their children, if there was no place to send their children to school or places to get medical care, if they faced constantly being hunted down and deported do you honestly think this wouldn't be a massive detriment to coming or staying in this country? Do you?
So Mr. Adelson I strongly disagree with your statements that getting rid of and preventing even more invasions are outside the realm of reasonableness or reality. They are very much possible and have been proven to be exceedingly effective. Plain and simple they work and work well.
The problem, the issue which may be beyond realistic, the issue which may be unreasonable isn't whether its possible to get rid of them and prevent others from coming, the issue is getting this President and this government to do what is necessary to rid this land of the invading forces.
Expecting them to implement effective measure to rid us of these hordes and prevent more from coming may be unrealistic and outside of reality but the methods and possibility sure exist if those in power would do it.
The fact the government supports this invasion and that business supports it and the fact you and Mr. Murdoch have jumped on supporting it doesn't mean the people of this country support it or should support it. I for one hope they never do.
So lets take these kids coming across, reunite them with their illegal parents and ship the whole lot back to where they came from. Lets take the families, mothers and kids, and teens and either ship them outright back to where they come from or reunite them with other illegal members of their family and do the same.
Lets set laws making being in this country illegally untenable and lets make those cities, counties and states who choose to oppose our laws actually enforce and support them. Lets get our military down there on the border and take active forceful measures to stop the invasion.
Lets meet the invaders with force and determination rather than accommodation and acceptance.
Lets put a stop to it and put a stop to it now. It can be done if there is the will to do it.
Lets make our politicians do what is right for this country and take a stand. Lets tell Republicans that this appeasement strategy isn't acceptable and won't be tolerated.
Let's shut the door and make it one way going out.
All that is needed is people to stand up and demand it. Show the media and politicians that we, the people, don't want legalization, amnesty, accommodation, appeasement, or any of the other things being offered to the invaders, proposed to them or already given them.
Lets fight back and retake our country.
This last week or so is only the latest assault upon our borders. This time with collusion by the sitting President and our government.
Thousands upon thousands of illegals are storming our borders, breaching them and invading our country.
The President of this country has not only encouraged this attack upon us but facilitated it. His response to the situation.
Set up more places for them to live, give them bus tickets to further their invasion into the heartland of the country, provide legal representation to keep the invaders here and make sure they don't get sent away. Do everything short of issuing pardons and do not do anything to rid our country of these vermin.
Instead of doing everything possible to prevent and repel the invasion he's done nothing but support it and encourage it. He is helping the invaders come and remain in this country not get rid of them.
The Vice-President has stated they are citizens of this country in his view. Statements have also been made that these enemies of the state are the epitome of what this country is all about and should be allowed to stay. But not only allowed to stay but welcomed and helped in any way possible by our government.
The democrats have jumped on this bandwagon echoing the same sentiments. Calling for supposed "Reform" to accept these invaders and make them US citizens rather than fight vigorously to get rid of them.
The President takes an oath of office to defend this country from enemies foreign and domestic, to faithfully defend the Constitution and protect this land.
He has not done this. The Vice-President has not done this. The Senators and Congressmen of the House and Senate have largely not done this.
Instead he and the others have opened their arms to the invading forces of our country. He has done the exact opposite from defending this country from that invading force. He set up the latest invasion and continues even as it goes on to facilitate said invasion. We have the hordes coming across with a free ride once they get here, bringing with them disease, criminality, lack of education and other problems. These problems will migrate from the border to wherever these people end up. Impacting those local areas, police, fire, ems, schools, jails, welfare, and medical amongst many other negative impacts.
This is called treason. To have a President actively doing what this one is amounts to nothing more than that. This President is not defending this country from enemies foreign or domestic or defending this country from attack. Neither is his government including his Vice-President. Our Congress is not much better ranging from actively supporting the invasion of our shores to just not acting to defend us from said invasion. Democrats and Republicans alike are to blame.
As much as I would like to put the entire blame onto this President and democrats and while there is a huge amount of blame to be placed upon them, there is also blame to be placed squarely on the shoulders of the Republicans.
For some reason the Republicans keep taking a non-committal approach to the issue of amnesty. Talking about reform and other mealy mouthed crap rather than standing up and taking a stand. Even after Cantor lost due to that approach they still make noises of appeasement towards pro-amnesty proponents and even deny the reason for that representative's loss.
In the last couple of days both Sheldon Adelson and Rupert Murdoch, two big Republican supporters, have come out with calls for amnesty and pushing Republicans to pass it. Mr. Adelson even went so far as to say that expecting or even thinking about getting rid of the masses which have invaded our country is ridiculous and not realistic. Basically saying if you think along those lines you must be crazy.
While Obama and his administration are out there telling their planned campaign about violence and fear driving those who have overran our borders and telling America that most people in this country want amnesty for all these illegals, these have been proven to be nothing more than propaganda lies. Just like the story they have put out about why Cantor lost the election. They say it had nothing to do with his pro-immigration stance yet it has been proven to have been all about that stance. People didn't like it and said so with their vote.
Interview after interview with the illegals, with those working with the illegals, and with experts with knowledge of the illegals all have said one thing. Its the same reason as it has always been. Money and benefits. They come because they are poor and have been told, think, or know they can get a much better standard of living here in the US than whatever hovel they originated from.
Violence and fear while existing has been shown NOT to be the primary cause of the invasion. In some instances it is also cited but the primary reason is the same as it was 30 years ago. They talk about better homes, schools, medical care, free stuff, benefits, welfare, food stamps, etc. etc.
This is what drives these people, this is what has always driven these people.
The claim the American people overwhelmingly want amnesty for the invaders is beyond ridiculous. They don't, plain and simple. They may want reform but that reform is to get rid of what is here and prevent more from coming. It sure as hell isn't amnesty.
So in the last few days I find it interesting the media has suddenly been showing human interest stories with one big theme running throughout. The Administration's version of things. CNN had a couple today. One about this seventeen year old who fled solely because of violence and was raped and all the travails she supposedly went through to get here. The other about a like boy and his brother who was brutally murdered in his home country and his travails to get here. The underlying message "How can you want to kick them out now that they've been through so much and finally got here?"
All pushing the violence and fear scenario as put out by Obama et. al.
So even though this President has committed treason by acting against this country's interests, inviting, encouraging, facilitating, aiding and supporting the invasion of our country. Even though he continues to act in a treasonous manner by doing everything he can to help the invading forces in our land and for them to remain here rather than repel them the American people must stand up and fight these actions, these forces, and this administration.
Contrary to what Mr. Adelson and Mr. Murdoch propose, that is the last thing we should be doing. We must not legitimize the invasion of our country by foreign nationals. We must take concrete forceful steps to repel that invasion and get rid of those already here.
Contrary especially to what Mr. Adelson has said it has been proven that if steps are taken to make life here untenable for these hordes they will leave and leave running. It has been done even if it did not get a chance to last long enough.
Arizona before the courts put a stop to it set in motion steps which proved 150% effective in combating the invasion of that state. While those steps were in effect masses and masses of illegals fled that state for other places where the welcome mat had been set out.
It was so bad that California even sued Arizona over the massive influx of illegals which descended upon their state once Arizona's law went into effect. Then again California has always put up signs welcoming illegals with open arms. They just weren't too happy when thousands and thousands suddenly showed up on their doorstep.
I still remember all the interviews with illegals which the media did trying to drum up sympathy and attack Arizona's laws. For me I just laughed at seeing someone finally do something that worked. These people were frightened, they said things like they had no place to go in Arizona, they wouldn't be able to work in Arizona, they basically wouldn't be able to do much of anything in Arizona and they faced capture at every turn and deportation so they were leaving and going other places where they would be able to do all the things Arizona was going to prevent them from doing and where they'd be welcome.
Folks IT WORKED!!!
They fled the state en masse. Imagine what would happen if those laws were put into place on a nationwide basis. Where would they go?
Nowhere in this country.
Imagine all the problems we have related to illegals being in this country. Overcrowded schools, medical systems, courts, prisons, police forces and many more, including the diseases they bring. Now imagine the illegals gone and not having any of those problems.
If effective disincentives to be, remain in or come to this country were put into broad implementation things would change and change quickly with respect to this problem. If there was no place they could go, no place to live, no place to work, no way to feed themselves or their children, if there was no place to send their children to school or places to get medical care, if they faced constantly being hunted down and deported do you honestly think this wouldn't be a massive detriment to coming or staying in this country? Do you?
So Mr. Adelson I strongly disagree with your statements that getting rid of and preventing even more invasions are outside the realm of reasonableness or reality. They are very much possible and have been proven to be exceedingly effective. Plain and simple they work and work well.
The problem, the issue which may be beyond realistic, the issue which may be unreasonable isn't whether its possible to get rid of them and prevent others from coming, the issue is getting this President and this government to do what is necessary to rid this land of the invading forces.
Expecting them to implement effective measure to rid us of these hordes and prevent more from coming may be unrealistic and outside of reality but the methods and possibility sure exist if those in power would do it.
The fact the government supports this invasion and that business supports it and the fact you and Mr. Murdoch have jumped on supporting it doesn't mean the people of this country support it or should support it. I for one hope they never do.
So lets take these kids coming across, reunite them with their illegal parents and ship the whole lot back to where they came from. Lets take the families, mothers and kids, and teens and either ship them outright back to where they come from or reunite them with other illegal members of their family and do the same.
Lets set laws making being in this country illegally untenable and lets make those cities, counties and states who choose to oppose our laws actually enforce and support them. Lets get our military down there on the border and take active forceful measures to stop the invasion.
Lets meet the invaders with force and determination rather than accommodation and acceptance.
Lets put a stop to it and put a stop to it now. It can be done if there is the will to do it.
Lets make our politicians do what is right for this country and take a stand. Lets tell Republicans that this appeasement strategy isn't acceptable and won't be tolerated.
Let's shut the door and make it one way going out.
All that is needed is people to stand up and demand it. Show the media and politicians that we, the people, don't want legalization, amnesty, accommodation, appeasement, or any of the other things being offered to the invaders, proposed to them or already given them.
Lets fight back and retake our country.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)