Recent events.

Lets see, we have the truth of Baltimore finally and it of course negates all the cries of racism and murder that the blacks have cried about since it happened.

It was an accident and it was because the guy didn't stay down as he was placed in the van. No, he get up and then was thrown around in the vehicle because of that. Being thrown around meant he broke his neck thus dying. 

So once again he caused his own death. If he'd stayed down on the floor of the van where he'd been placed he's still be alive. He didn't and isn't. 

To the shooting in SC. Its horrible and wrong. With that said is it any wonder something like this finally happened? 

The blacks have been going around since Ferguson and before calling for a "Race war" along with calls to murder white babies in the hospital when they're born and other disgusting demands to murder white people including burning them alive. 

Yet people are surprised when some white nut actually does something like this? 

I'm actually surprised it hasn't happened before. They ask for it then someone is going to take them up  on it. 

Unlike the nut job most of us I imagine are just sitting back and waiting. If the blacks ever start it we'll be there to finish it but I don't think any of us are going to go out and chase their sorry asses down to bring it to them. 

As to the Confederate flag issue, I've never owned one as far as I can recall, but just because the blacks are whining so much, I think I'm going to go buy a few and put a bumper sticker on my vehicle. 

Shame on Amazon, Wal-Mart and Ebay for caving in and abandoning freedom on the altar of appeasement and political correctness. 

Donald Trump. Well he's in it for the attention in my opinion. I don't give much credence to him as a "Real" candidate at all. I also don't think he stands a chance in hell of getting elected dog catcher. 

With that said a lot of his comments on Mexico are true. I've said it before myself. Mexico sends the trash up here. Its that simple. Everything you don't want is what they get rid of and send north to us. 

Mexico has never been our friend in that regard. They vociferously attack any measures to combat illegals in our country and demand we let their people into our land without penalty. Any attempt to do so results in condemnation by them. 

According to them we should be ashamed of not wanting hordes of the lowest of the low invading our country. 

Remember these are the same people who don't even know what a toilet is much less how to use one as was shown in numerous news reports last year. 

So he's right, we need to stop it, we need to seal the border and we need to deport what is already here. I didn't hear him talk about the last one but that needs to be in there as well. 

I'm watching Europe have a fit with all the illegals swarming over their lands. No one wants them but no one has the balls to say they don't want them. Except for Hungary who has stood up to the EU and told them no more. Now Hungary is being attacked by all for wanting to defend their lands from invasion and being taken over by blacks and middle eastern people. 

Australia is also under attack once again for defending their country from invasion. The difference is that the leader there has stuck up his middle finger to the world and said illegals aren't welcome there. Good for him and good for Hungary.

Now my question is why can't the European countries have a pair and say the same. Europe is being destroyed by these invaders. 

The illegals bring their problems with them, won't assimilate into whatever culture they end up in and then demand that culture change to reflect and legitimize theirs. 

We have the same problem. Like here, no one in Europe seems willing to stand up and stop it. Why can't the words "Send them back" ever come from their lips.

They don't.

Blacks won another nail in America's coffin this week at the Supreme Court. 

The case involved whether something results in supposed discrimination can be held against the government even though it was never meant to be discriminatory. The Court ruled yes it can.

What is even worse is that it involves a longstanding liberal goal of forcing unwanted people into white areas where they are not welcome.

Now don't get me wrong I'm not saying letting blacks into a white area is bad or wrong but this is far beyond that. This isn't some case where they wouldn't sell a house to a black person. That would be wrong. No this is much more insidious and evil a plan by liberals. 

You see liberals have been trying to force white communities, well off ones at that, to allow public housing in them. 

Their idea is that whites moved out of the inner city to get away from the criminal blacks and that is not fair. The blacks have no one left to commit their crimes against except other blacks. That only blacks suffer because they've destroyed their communities, schools etc. and the whites are not suffering at all anymore. 

This is bad according to them.

So under Clinton they came up with a great plan. Put blacks and other minorities, the poor, into white areas where the whites had fled too to get away from them. 

That means they're exporting the crime, poverty, drugs, and violence into areas without them so all can suffer equally. 

So under the title of "Inclusive communities project" they are demanding public housing be built in white affluent areas rather than in poor minority areas where its needed under the idea that they can then ship the minorities into the new housing in the white areas thereby changing them to integrated communities. Forced integration but integrated.

The problem is that whites left the areas to get away from everything the blacks etc brought to them. It is not fair to now shove those problems into areas which do not have them. Its unfair to make the whites move yet again to get away from these scum. 

At what point will people let people alone. I remember forced busing many years ago. It just bused the problems into areas that did not have those problems and created the problems in these new communities. It certainly did not help the white schools and communities where the blacks were sent to. 

Now its not busing but wholesale redesign of the communities to fit some liberal model. Why should all suffer because some people can't be civilized? 

Why must white/affluent communties be forced to accept the dregs of society into them. Why? Especially when all know that nothing good will come of the influx of trouble into areas where its not present. Community after community, school after school, city after city gets destroyed when these people come yet somehow these liberals think this is a good idea? How? 

Its like illegals, nothing good comes with their coming. Every aspect of life goes down with their presence. The same is true of blacks infesting areas where they haven't been. 

So the USSC ruled that governments creating public housing can be held at fault for discrimination even though that was never their intention simply because some see the results of building it as being discriminatory. That is because the public housing was built in black areas and not white ones. 

The idea being that in order to not be discriminatory public housing must be forced into communities where it is not wanted, not welcomed and will be extremely harmful vs building it in communities where the minorities are and need it. Where they've already destroyed the areas and more can't hurt them much. 

No, the only acceptable thing to do is put it into good areas where there is much to be lost and much to be destroyed. Let all suffer rather than just the ones doing the destruction. 

How sad as a  nation that we've devolved to this extent that we believe all should suffer to make up some bizarre concept of fairness seem appropriate. 

How far we've fallen.

Gun control is back in the news after SC and the President along with the anti-gun freaks are using SC as a rallying cry to take our guns yet again. This time in the name of race. 

More complete BS of course but it'll be interesting to see if it gains any traction this time around. 

Most of us already have our weapons and we're not going to give them up. 

Oh, while we've spent the week or so listening to calls of outrage over the shooter in SC and his racism and calls for a race war it seems there is exactly no outrage about black leaders who Friday called for the murder of all whites again. Oh they also called for the destruction of the American flag as a symbol of our country as that is just as racist as the Confederate flag supposedly is.

Ever hear the word "Hypocrisy?"

So while Dylan Roof is apparently evil personified for his racist acts and calling for a race war, blacks doing the same are okay since they're black.

Even while Roof was decried the blacks continued their call for the same race war. I suppose their version has blacks coming out on top though. 

I wonder anymore whether people have the balls to fight if it came to that. Sadly I'm not so sure anymore. I will and my family but how many others would roll over in the face of having to fight? 

I fear the answer. 

Well that rounds up some recent events. Oh the spoiled children of Greece are hopefully about to get their butts spanked big time if the EU doesn't wuss out of course. 

Its about time. Liberals just can't seem to grasp you can't spend, spend and spend and have no money to pay for it. The fact the creditors have played this game for so long with a bunch of whiny children who don't want to face facts and do what must be done doesn't encourage me much that they will actually slap them down but we'll see. 

They've been told a hundred times what they need to do and they won't do it. They whine and cry over and over again about it but won't comply. Yet the EU keeps letting them get away with it and does essentially nothing to force them to behave in an acceptable manner. Maybe this time will be different.

It is like much else with liberals, they don't want to do what they're supposed to do and demand everyone else change to accommodate them. The problem is that we around the world have been doing so for far too long on far too many issues. 

Let's hope this time it won't happen and Greece will find out what getting their ass handed to them really means. 

 

Words and Meanings

I was just reading an article by Tim Reid at Reuters and while reading came across a statement by him which I found deeply troubling yet reflective of the bias in media today.

English isn't taught like it used to be and much surrounding it's use is no longer explained. 

For those of us who were actually taught the language and taught about it's varied uses this will be familiar but for those who haven't been, it won't.

Words have meaning.

I'm sure you've heard that many, many times. It a true statement but it also means much more. 

Its also how you use the words, which words you use and the surrounding words used to expand meaning.

You can make the same statement many different ways and have it mean many different things. Its all about what words you use and the manner in which you use them.

What disturbed me here was one statement in the article that made me stop and say "Wait a damn minute" 

It concerns the shooting of Brown in Ferguson Mo. Now we all know this criminal black man attacked and tried to kill a police officer resulting in the officer having to shoot Brown to save his own life. 

Now read the statement from this reporter
"... has helped organized protests around the killing of Michael Brown, a black teenager gunned down by a white policeman in Ferguson, Missouri."

Notice especially the words "Killing" and "Gunned Down" 

Those words turn the meaning of what happened into something completely different than what actually occurred. 

Brown wasn't "Gunned down" and there wasn't a "Killing" as its put here. Put the surrounding context of "Teenager" and "By a white policeman" and you have something that implies a poor kid was brutally murdered by a white (racist) cop in Ferguson.

It completely changes the dynamic of what truly happened. It makes a justifiable use of deadly force by a police officer who was being attacked by a violent criminal into something foul, wrong and horrible rather than what it was. 

Brown wasn't gunned down or a victim of a killing and of course race had nothing to do with it. 

By choosing words carefully a writer can impart a different view of an event and essentially make it something different than what it actually was. 

Using words like "Teenager" equate him to a child and the black/white contrast implies racism being present and the reason for the incident to have happened at all. 

Add "Gunned down" and you bring up images of innocent people being slaughtered by evil perpetrators rather than a cop defending himself from attack. 

Words are important and when they are used disingenuously to alter the narrative of something to advance a viewpoint they can and do cause harm. 

This insistence to completely mischaracterize the events of Ferguson Mo by so many liberal writers furthers a disservice to blacks and the nation as a whole. It has also caused strife and will continue to do so.

A better way, and a much more accurate way of describing the events of that day would be along the lines of "...has helped organize protests around the death of Michael Brown, a violent criminal who was shot while attacking a police officer."

But that you see is the truth and the truth is not what these people want. 

Words have meaning, watch what words are being used and how they are being used. As you can see two different descriptions of the same event and they are vastly different and make you feel two completely different things.

I didn't even try to slant it to my viewpoint yet you can clearly see the differences and how the meaning is changed from one to the other. 

Writers select words, sometimes with great specificity to convey their thoughts, feelings and opinions about something. The problem is that writers whose task it is to bring us the news should not be using them in the way which they do. They should be reporting the news accurately and without slant for any viewpoint. 

If it is slanted then its called "Opinion" not news. 

These distinctions have been blurred or even erased in today's modern era and part of that is too many people fail to comprehend the subtle use of words to change minds, opinions and feelings on subjects.

The fact is Michael Brown was a violent criminal who tried to kill a police officer after robbing a store. He then came back to finish the job and the cop shot him in self defense. He died being what he was and he died because of his choices not the cops'. 

Yet in story after story in the news that is not the story which is told. Instead its about an sweet young boy who was brutally murdered by a racist cop. 

How the two wildly diverging narratives even exist is beyond me yet the false narrative is firmly implanted into America's and even the world's consciousness and seems destined to be given credence no matter the actual truth of the matter. 

Its rather sad to see our once discerning nation so taken in by lies, deceit and outright manipulation as has taken place. 

I seriously wonder if we stand a chance. 

 

Immigration World-Wide and the Effort to Destroy Western Civilization

As many of you know by now Europe, parts of Asia and Australia are facing hordes of third world illegals swarming and attempting to swarm their borders. 

I have watched over the last years as more and more third world denizens invade traditionally white countries such as Britain, France, Germany, Denmark, and other such countries. 

I have watched as they have taken over large swathes of those countries and brought those countries to third world status in many of their cities and/or neighborhoods. 

Whether its Muslims overtaking European areas and imposing their beliefs on Christian nations and demanding special treatment and allowance or blacks from third world countries doing the same. 

Its been bad for all those countries. Its getting worse. 

Masses of middle east and blacks are now literally attacking the shores of the countries in Europe and now Asia. 

This is getting so bad its thousands a day at times. For a while the cry by liberals was that they were refugees needing protection and these white well off countries must let them in and give them full benefits and citizenship. 

Now the truth has emerged. Most are simply what the liberals are calling "Economic Refugees" 

That means they are a bunch of poor people looking for the good life and the liberals are saying the well off countries must take them in and provide it. 

There is no longer any pretense of other issues. Its straight now that the rich must give to the poor and since the rich countries won't do that then the rich countries must allow the poor countries' populations to surge into the rich ones and get the wealth that way. 

This on the fact that once these people are in whatever rich country the country will provide for them and God forbid if any doesn't want to. 

It doesn't matter if these countries are pauperizing themselves by doing this. It doesn't matter if the very foundations of these countries is being eroded and destroyed. 

It only matters that the whites pay. 

It doesn't matter that these illegals don't assimilate, don't want to assimilate and demand the right to not do so. Any attempt to force them to do such results in the liberals coming in screaming these people have a right to their culture and to live by it. 

But they don't. You want to live by your culture then stay in whatever country that the culture belongs to. You don't get to go to someone else country and demand they accept your culture instead of theirs. Yet that is what happens. 

That is what is allowed. 

These illegals much as they do in America, destroy the health system, the school system, the legal system, the prison system and the society to which they invade. 

And its being allowed to happen every single day and its getting worse. 

Now the cry is that none of the economic refugees can be sent back because they'd be poor in their own countries and they have some nebulous right to be well off or better off than they would have been if they had stayed put or are sent back.

Where in the hell did such a thing come from and when did it get classified as a right? 

That is the most asinine thing I've heard lately. As much as I'd like to have a right to be well off instead of poor the facts are that I'm not and I don't have nor should I have any "Right" to any such thing. 

Then again I'm white so I'm sure the whole thing wouldn't apply to me anyway. It seems to only be for third world minorities who have the right to overwhelm and destroy well off white societies. 

As liberals the world over cry that the white countries must accept these minorities from the poorest and worst of the lot any suggestion of sending them back or God forbid worst of all preventing them coming is met with shrieks and cries of the sky is falling and the end is nigh. 

So as thousands invade Europe, Italy and Greece are being overwhelmed. The invaders camp out wherever they choose, take over building and claim them for their own all the while bitching that not enough is being done to make their life better and demanding more, a lot more. 

On top of that any country who actually says "No" to this invasion faces international attack and condemnation from the other countries who don't have the courage to do the same. 

Australia is a perfect example of a people who have said "No more" and done something about it. They won't take em. Period. 

They send them back or stick them on some island far out at sea and let em know you ain't coming here. 

For their common sense in protecting their country they are under attack from the liberals and other countries who should be doing the same yet are not. 

The latest was several days ago when Australia turned back yet another boat full of third world scum. 

The condemnation was swift but thankfully the head of the country told them where to take their whining. 

The countries in Europe who are being inundated by these hordes of lowlifes should be doing the same thing but instead they are attacking Australia for doing what they cannot. 

I do hope Australia doesn't bow to pressure but only time will tell. 

In the meantime several countries in Asia including Thailand took a stand and refused to be overrun by these hordes. They turned back boats and kicked any that made the hell out of their countries. 

Good for them but instead the international community came out and attacked them as well. Telling them they must allow all these poor folk to invade their country with impunity. Somehow they apparently have garnered a "Right" to do so and any country who doesn't like it is now an evil and racist entity. 

After much screaming including from the UN unsurprisingly at least one of the countries has since caved in and allowed the boats filled with the indigent to invade. 

Somehow over the years we've allowed people to tell us that we owe something to every single piece of $hit poor person in the world. People that don't even know what a toilet is much less anything such as reading and writing. 

We've been told that they have a "Right" to this and to that, to our countries, to our money, to our schools, to our health system and much else. We've been told they have a "Right" to keep their culture and not become part of ours and any attempt to make them is discriminatory and a violation of said "Right" 

We've been told that they have a "Right" to what we have.

Where in the hell did they get any such thing? When did we allow these "Rights" to be created and at what point did we allow ourselves to be governed by these supposed "Rights?"

Yet that is what we face today around the world. Any nation that is considered "First World" has been placed under an obligation to suffer under the onslaught of the poor masses of third world countries simply because we've made our countries into something good, even great.

When did we get this obligation and who the hell says we have to have it in the first place? 

More importantly why aren't more people and leaders saying "NO" to this supposed obligation. 

Why aren't the leaders defending their countries? Instead they capitulate without even a whimper to demands that will eventually lead to the destruction of their country and everything that made it great. 

In an article yesterday it spoke of how the birth rate among
Germans was falling rapidly and wasn't keeping up with the death rate.  This means the native Germans will be screwed in twenty years or so with more elders than young. 

Yet also noted was the illegals who have invaded that country having an astronomical birthrate and how that was quite high. Those third world denizens invading Germany are growing in leaps and bounds and at some point in the not too distant future they will outnumber real Germans. 

They don't assimilate, they destroy the areas they infest and this is what will take over Germany. They will destroy the entire country and they will make it black and brown instead of white. 

The same thing is happening in other countries including the United States. 

The blacks have an entire continent they have $hit in and managed to make a cesspool. Why in hell are we allowing them to do it to the countries in Europe and America?

They made Africa into a cesspool that they now claim they can't live in and must therefore move to these white countries but once there they don't change their ways they instead turn wherever they go into the same type of cesspools from which they came. 

The same applies to the Muslims. They live in hell by their own choosing and making and have for thousands of years. Muslims are barbarians and the antithesis to everything Western civilization stands for yet they're swarming these countries and their being allowed in to fundamentally transform Western countries into cesspools much like the ones they left. 

This unfettered immigration does nothing good for any of these countries anymore than the illegal Mexicans do for us here in the US. 

Like here they invade, destroy, lower standards of living and bitch about not getting enough from our society. They don't assimilate they instead demand we change our country, our culture, our laws and beliefs to accommodate them. 

And to make it much worse we allow them to do so. 

That is the definition of insanity if I've ever heard it. 

Unless Europe and the United States is willing to stand up and put a stop to these hordes invading our country and make no mistake that is what it is. Even now the UN and other countries are demanding we take in the blacks and Muslims they are being overrun with. Unless we do that and make a concerted effort to remove the illegal ones already here then we are doomed. 

Our countries, our society, our beliefs, our culture, our very way of being is going to end and not end well at that. 

People need to wake up and realize what is happening, what has been happening and what is wanted by liberals to happen or we as Western civilization are doomed. 

I fear that won't happen. Even talking about stopping the boats and turning the hordes back has been attacked already and so far nothing like that has been done. Instead more have been allowed in to European shores. 

Europe is begging the UN to be allowed to defend themselves from invasion. When did these countries over there get to the point where they have to ask for permission to defend themselves from assault by the unwashed masses invading their land?

Hell when did the UN get the right to say anything to us for arresting and sending back illegals crossing our border? Yet they have been doing it with impunity. 

This is a concerted attack on Western civilization by the liberals who want to restructure the world and we're allowing them to succeed. 

Israel, Australia, Thailand and one other seem to be the only countries in the world who are standing up and saying "No" to being taken over by illegal hordes. 

They are under constant attack for doing so.

Four countries out of so many. 

Something is decidedly wrong with that. 

 

 

 

Ann Coulter

You know you see Mrs. Coulter all over the news and she sounds like she's just what you want in a conservative but I've noticed she's not what she pretends to be.

You see it in little comments she makes about real conservatives and members of the "Tea Party" who she seems to actually loathe. 

The very ones who she "Seems" to emulate are also apparently the ones she can't stand. 

She relegates us to being fringe nut jobs not worthy of being taken seriously.

In her latest story she wrote for publication she spoke of her new book "Adios, America" 

She seems to really slam the problem of the illegal invasion of our country. While she makes out like she's slamming Democrats for their perfidy in bringing all these illegals in and while she attacks Republicans for doing basically the same, she also says something else. 

In almost an aside in the article she wrote she says no one is seriously proposing to round up all the illegals and deport them. 

The way she says it is as if the idea is beyond ridiculous and not worth even thinking about much less suggesting. She makes it sound as if the very idea is loathsome and one that no sane person would contemplate. 

"Absolutely no one has proposed that we deport all those here illegally — much less “arrest” them."

Yet that is exactly what must happen to save this country and restore it to one of Americans and not some foreign cesspool third world entity which it is fast becoming. 


So in the end Mrs. Coulter is the same as the Democrats and Republicans she is attacking. She also doesn't want to round the illegals up, arrest them, and deport them. 

Which means she wants them to stay. 

While she suggests letting them continue to live uncomfortably in the shadows she is indeed suggesting they should remain, just not get a path to citizenship. 

Why on Earth is it so wrong to come out and say that we need to round them up, arrest them, and send them packing forthwith. 

Why? 

That is what needs to be done and while Mrs. Coulter cries about the thirty million plus illegals plaguing our country so awfully and tells us how bad that is for our country on many, many fronts, she also says they must be allowed to stay, just not as citizens. 

That is wrong. Maybe her book actually says something different than her article but after watching her over time I find most of her diatribes are two edge swords and not nearly as conservative as she would like to make people believe her to be. 

The solution for the illegals is exactly what she intimates is ridiculous, get rid of them and keep anymore from coming. 

All the problems she tells us about because of the invasion which has brought those thirty million people here are going to continue if the reason for them remains. 

Apparently under her ideas they should. How this is supposed to solve any of the problems she rightfully brings up is unknown. 

I don't see how it can. 

Here is the link to her article for which I have the above quote. 
http://nypost.com/2015/05/31/ann-coulter-elites-conspire-against-the-middle-class/

I don't really think she is all that much better than the people she attacks. If not for conservatives and "Tea Party" folk then who is supposed to represent American ideals and beliefs. Certainly not the Republican party we have now nor the Democrats. 

And not her either I think.

 

U.K. Election

A brief note about the election in the UK recently.

I thought the liberals were bad here in the US with the crying and whining they did upon losing in 2014 but they don't hold a candle to the UK liberals. 

The end of the world is nigh according to them. 

It was funny as hell reading them crying incessantly over Cameron's win. 

The thing that gets me is that they refused to accept it as did the ones here.

They insist Britain doesn't support the conservatives even though they handed them a knock out victory in the election.

Who the hell was voting if it wasn't the British citizens?

To listen to the liberals over there it sure wasn't the actual citizens of the UK.

Instead they spend their cry fest on telling the Tories not to do anything of the promises that got them elected.

They demanded that the conservatives follow a liberal roadmap even though that ideology was soundly trounced by the voters.

As here they refuse to accept the people don't want that. 

Whether or not the conservatives will actually do what they should over there following conservative precepts is up for discussion. 

The Tories may be the same as the Republicans in the end. Campaigning on all sorts of things then betraying the people who gave them the power by refusing to implement their promises. 

I don't know but hope Britain will go staunchly conservative in practice as well as in word.

In the meantime the liberals cry and whine which is always immensely enjoyable to watch.

More and more across the world the liberals are finding out that their view of life is not wanted nor liked. 

My question is when will they learn that and more over accept that.

For us, the UK and other countries I hope its soon

Sad state of affairs, are we completely lost?

I've been thinking for some time now about posting a new piece here. 

But every time I think about it I choose not to do it. 

Part of that is not wanting to write yet another rant about the blacks and their diseased mentality, the liberals', or some such. I've written enough about that. 

Part is frankly the utter dismay and disgust I behold each time I see these vermin out there whether in the street or on TV or the reporters instigating so much of these issues. More frightening though is not seeing anyone stand up to this crap, not any politician and not even the police for the most part. 

Watching these scum get away with vilifying the police for their actions and running rampant across our cities is not only highly disgusting but heartbreaking as well. To see our nation fallen to this level of anarchy is disheartening to say the least.

Another part is that I keep wondering what thing is going to happen next that will effect whatever I'm thinking about writing. 

Then again my arthritis is really acting up, especially in one hand right now and typing is even more painful than it has been. I'll have to go to the doctor after the first of the year. I've been putting it off but just can't do it any longer.

Either way as I write this its a couple days after two innocent police officers were gunned down by a Muslim black man in revenge for the two criminals who attacked and fought with the police and died.

From CNN to reporters everywhere, from President Obama to the Mayor of NYC, all are trying to say this scum and the protests had nothing to do with each other. That the daily calls to kill cops had nothing to do with someone finally doing so. That chanting about wanting dead cops every single day had no impact on this person who shot the officers in revenge for those two criminals dying by their own actions. 

Much like Michael Brown's stepfather who cried to "Burn this bitch down" referring to the city of Ferguson and then cried his calls had nothing to do with the people with him then going out and doing exactly that, these people now claim their calls for death to police had nothing to do with this man doing what they wanted so badly. 

Our good old terrorist Baseem even said the cops got what they deserved and brought it on themselves yet he and the rest didn't really want the cops they constantly threaten to kill actually dead. 

Reporters bring this little point up were screamed at by the Mayor of NYC for trying to "Divide" the city at this time. I thought that's what the protesters and he had done, not the few reporters to question him with basic facts he doesn't like. 

I once wrote half jokingly and half seriously that blacks could solve most if not all their problems if they did two thing when dealing with cops. (The whole diseased mentality thing is another issue) 

1. Do what you're told to do

2. Do what you're told when you're told to do it.

Every single instance I can think of since summer that is being protested had those two simple principles violated. 


Brown didn't do what he was told, Garner didn't, Crawford didn't, Rice didn't, the Phoenix case didn't, and it goes on and on. If they had none of this would likely have happened at all. 

Brown robbed a store, tried to kill an officer and came back to finish the job. Garner didn't want to go to jail and said he wasn't as he fought off cops who took him to the ground. Crawford was waving a gun around inside a store and didn't put it down when ordered to do so. Rice when ordered to put his hands up instead grabbed the gun and pulled it out of his waist where it was located. The drug dealer in Phoenix didn't follow directions either. The guy in St. Louis not only attacked a cop then ran from him but he turned around and began firing on the officer. The other St. Louis case was a man who had a knife and instead of following orders to drop it charged the officers with it. 

This is what is being protested. Criminals not doing as their told and resisting, fighting, shooting or threatening our police officers. In a couple of cases after the fact it was found to be a toy gun or BB gun, one man didn't have a gun although his actions led the cop to think he did. 

Thousands of people of this county are out protesting for criminals. They are protesting police officers doing their job and protecting themselves from those self same criminals. 

This is the reality. There is no racism, there is no brutality. There are criminals who don't like their criminal actions interfered with as in they don't like the cops and there are cops trying to do their jobs to get these criminals and having to defend their lives while doing it.

When did we get to be such a nation where we are supporting the bad guy and attacking the good guy? When?

That disturbs me more than anything else about these last months. 

You see the blacks have been whining and crying about police since I can remember so there isn't really anything new there. They don't like the cops and never have. They don't want the cops around unless they call em in. Even when they do call them they don't want them or like them. There is no way a cop can win in a black community. So any cop is a bad cop to them in essence.

A cop doing their job is an affront to blacks because it means the blacks aren't getting to do their thing which is criminal actions.

I remember when they protested the LAPD getting semi-automatics for their officers and that was in the eighties believe it or not. The black criminals had them but the LAPD not only had only six shooters but bullets that didn't do much of anything when someone was shot by them instead of semi-jacketed hollow points which were much more effective and in use by everyone else. 

It was blacks and the black mayor of LA who refused to allow the police to upgrade their guns and ammo long after most other police agencies in the area and country had done so. 

The cry, racism and police brutality. That is what new guns and ammo would be for the blacks in the LA area if those things were allowed. More black criminals would be more likely to die with the new stuff than with the old which was true as before it came into being more cops were dying and the blacks liked it that way.

Gates the LAPD chief finally implemented both which the blacks hated him for. Matter of fact the blacks hated Gates period because he didn't bow down to them and their conduct and demands. He supported his officers as a chief should do.

I had a great deal of respect for Chief Gates until he threw the Rodney King officers under the bus like he did. For probably the first time in his career he bowed to the blacks and sacrificed his officers on the alter of black appeasement, condemning them when they were innocent, before the investigation could even be completed.

I knew for sure they were when towards the beginning of things a black LAPD Lt. told me if there was any justice in the world they'd be found innocent because they were.

There has been a very long history of blacks crying mistreatment and racism in this county by the police. As in Rodney King if the man had just followed orders he would've been fine but he didn't and in an effort not to kill him they decided to use less lethal force on him. All know what happened from there sadly. The cops were vindicated at trial but stabbed in the back by the Federal government trying them again in a clear case of double jeopardy. 

As I've said many times since that happened, they should have just shot the son of a bitch.

Nothing has changed, the blacks still cry foul and whine about being forced to behave as civilized people which they mainly do not. 

What has changed is back then the sentiment of people was maybe next time the SOB will get down on the damn ground when he's told to instead of fighting the police. Now though the sentiment is the cop should have ran away or let the suspect go, waited to see if the guy would have shot the officer or someone else, actually stabbed the officer or I'm still not sure what the cop being fired upon was supposed to have done, maybe die. 

I've seen comments the guy with the knife didn't actually stab the officer so it wasn't justified to shoot him. Other comments said that they could have jumped the guy and fought him for the knife and wouldn't have got hurt too badly so the shooting wasn't justified. More than a few insisted that it wasn't that big a knife so therefore shooting the guy over it was wrong. A couple said the cop should not have chased Myers and then Myers wouldn't have shot at the cop. A couple others have said Myers didn't hit the cop with his bullets so the shooting wasn't justified and a few even said the cop shouldn't have been harassing this thug and caused the whole thing therefore he wasn't justified in shooting the thug. 

I've seen repeatedly by vermin and reporters who say Wilson should have drove away, let Brown go, not fired but fought him, and such. In Garner's case it seems to be a case of it was a minor crime so they shouldn't have even been bothering him much less trying to arrest him and then he wouldn't have died. Not a damn one has said if he had said okay when they told him he was under arrest his death would not have happened. 

This isn't just a nutjob or two making comments but lots of people and the media agreeing with them. CNN backed the concept of Wilson should have ran away from Brown. What kind of stupidity has taken over this country where that thought or kind of thought can even exist?

Once again it is the criminals' actions that get the response they did from the police and no one to blame but the criminal. 

Yet that isn't the way it is any longer. 

Beyond the usual calls that I'm racist I've also been told that I'm old and they'll be glad when I and my kind die out so their views will rule all. That our thoughts and views about things are bad and have no place any longer in a "Fair and just" society.

I used to tell them fat chance of that ever happening but not anymore. Not anymore because I truly fear they are right and their views will rule here and not in some distant future but much sooner than anyone thinks or I want.

I fear now that I'll live to see it rather than die before such a horrendous future can come into effect. It has came upon us with such rapidity that it is truly frightening and no one seems to be able to see the frightful danger we and our country are now in.

I used to feel sad that my children and their children would have to deal with this wretched coming reality. Now I fear I'll have to deal with it and see it overtake us in my lifetime. 

Don't worry though, locked and loaded is the word here. 

Everyone was so gung ho about the Republicans taking over in November except me. I said repeatedly to the irritation of many that it wouldn't do any good because the Republicans getting elected possibly, were traitors to our fundamental beliefs and ideology. 

Many said I was wrong and a part of me truly hoped I was but as it turned out and all can see the only hope isn't at all. 

That was, I firmly believe, the last chance we had if we had one at all and it was gone before it could be even thought about actually happening.

We don't have anyone in power to fight for our ideals, our beliefs, our way of life. 

No one.

No one to fight against socialism or liberalism. The ones supposed to do the fighting not only are in bed with the enemy they've married them and they certainly don't want a divorce.

The few that might be real and there won't be able to stop it.

The right has been demonized for so long, marginalized into the fringe that its been too late for many, many years. 

Just look at all the crap with the blacks. Basically no one and certainly no politician has stood up and called bullshit on their views and mentality. Not a one has attacked them and supported the police. 

Not a damn one! 

Where in the hell are the Republicans who are supposed to be the "Law and order" party?

Nowhere to be seen, that's where.

Why? 

It makes no sense for them to remain silent. The blacks hate them anyway and will never vote for them so why aren't our Republican politicians standing up and taking the side of the police against these animals?

The worst thing hardly no one gets is our children are the ones who have been subverted under our noses while we smiled and thought how great their schools were, their teachers were etc. 

They've had fifty years of indoctrinating our children and its finally coming home to roost. The enemy is us and we haven't woke up yet to realize it. They're in our homes, they're our sons and daughters for many. They're in our schools and communities.

For the whack jobs who have been saying for years that the schools were brainwashing our children it is a sad vindication to be right. I certainly take no joy in it at all. 

Those people who have been trying to warn us were made out to be kooks and nutjobs. Instead they were prophets and I say that not being overly religious myself. 

Started this post in December of 2014 and its now May when I am continuing it. Same crap just different year.

The children  have been co-opted and follow the liberal disease hook line and sinker. They are our future and we have allowed that future to be destroyed by allowing the liberals to brainwash our children into a sick ideology that embraces everything our country is against. 

Just look at what is standard policy now in our schools. Children attacked have no right to self defense according to the liberals who run our schools. They must curl up in a ball, protect their head, and let whoever, beat them until a teacher arrives. What happened to the right to defend oneself from attack which is inviolable?

Parents are being attacked for sending "Unapproved" food items with their children to school. Food the parents bought and chose for their children is being taken away from the children. Its not up to the schools to tell children what they can and cannot eat and they certainly have no right to tell parents what they can and cannot feed their children.

Children expressing any anti-liberal belief are being penalized by schools from wearing an NRA t-shirt to one with the American flag on it. Since when did the Constitution and our country become unacceptable to support?

Cell phones are being taken away and parents told they're not going to be given back until the principal feels like it. We used to call that theft. What gives a school the right to steal?

Any child expressing views counter to liberal acceptability is ridiculed and even punished including expulsion from class. When did we get to the point where sickness is the only acceptable choice for our children?

Parents are being told that boys must be allowed to use the girls' restroom and girls the boys. If they don't like it then their bigots and anti-gay. Why can't whoever has a penis use the boy's bathroom and whoever has a vagina use the girls since that is what is accurate. A boy who thinks he's a girl is still a boy whether he likes it or not and it certainly doesn't give him any right to be in a girl's bathroom. When he loses the penis and gets a vagina then he can use the girl's bathroom.

It goes on and on. Since when did schools get the power to do these things? They don't have it except for parents allowing it. No one stands up to their abuse of authority.

 
Since I started this post there has been another black criminal death in association with the police in Baltimore and like before the blacks went on a rampage in their neighborhood.

Same as before. This time the local prosecutor betrayed the police and wrongly charged six officers in the man's death. 

The same things I said six months ago and in other posts apply here. If the man had done what he was told to do when he was told to do it he'd most likely be alive today. 22 criminal convictions on this particular innocent person.

He didn't and he isn't.

On another note a very brave prosecutor in Madison Wisconsin stood up and found a police officer used justified force in the shooting of another violent criminal black who had attacked several people and then attacked the cop. 

As usual the blacks are screaming he was murdered, he was an innocent baby, and its all racist. 

Doesn't matter if he had a violent criminal past which he did including home invasion and armed robbery. It doesn't matter that he attacked those people or that he attacked and injured the police officer. 

Instead a new word has come into use. Victim shaming. Supposedly now you're not allowed to say anything negative about the criminal in these encounters even though that criminality is what brought about their deaths.

But I take exception to even the use of the term "Victim": in these situations. These animals weren't "Victims" of anything. They were violent criminals doing something wrong. Attacking police, resisting arrest or something else which justified the use of force which occurred. 

To now say that it is not acceptable to say that the man attacked a cop, or attacked three people before the cop got there which was why the cop was sent in the first place. To say that it is not acceptable to say the man had a violent criminal history or that he was on multiple drugs at the time of the incident is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. 

Those things that are now being called "Victim shaming" are all material to the suspects death and the cause of it.

If he wasn't high on drugs he wouldn't have been going nuts, he wouldn't have been attacking strangers on the street and cars. He wouldn't have given a police officer a concussion by attacking him.

If none of those things had happened then the multiple calls to 911 would not have been made and the police wouldn't have been sent out to the scene. 

Finally if none  of that took place the officer wouldn't have had to fire his weapon killing this animal. 

So telling the inconvenient truth about these vermin is necessary to understanding the entire event and the why of the use of deadly force taking place. 

These blacks and their demands that nothing negative be said about these animals is nothing more than wanting a narrative that goes with what they always claim.

A police officer just walked up to an innocent black baby boy and cold bloodily murdered him without any reason. 

That is the only acceptable version of events to these people. There is never any justification for the police to shoot these people if you listen to them. Sad but that is how they see it which goes back to that diseased mentality which exists within a large segment of the black community. 

Now though with our children having been subverted as they have you can see our children in the streets supporting criminals and thugs. They are marching and protesting against common decency and law. They're attacking the police for doing their jobs hand in hand with the blacks. 

In addition to this you can see the effects of this subversion on the black community where it has been in even fuller swing than with the rest of our country. You can see the tremendous amount of black youth out there acting like savages and animals instead of decent human beings. 

Schools and colleges are once again being attacked for such things as telling blacks they are not speaking properly when they are not. Instead of working to correct their language deficiencies they are screaming racism for being brought to task. 

That means they're still not learning to speak proper English and that has serious consequences for being able to find advanced work beyond low level McDonalds type work.

Their idea is to force companies to ignore said deficiencies including others such as poor dress under the guise of racism to give them jobs they are not capable of performing. 

I've discussed other things before and won't go into them again but its not getting any better. 

Even though I haven't updated this post or blog in months it is the same things as before. The same perverse mentality I was talking about a year ago. The same issues and the same behavior taking place. 

That is why I wonder how things will be in the future and why I fear what's coming. No one is standing up for what's right. No one is standing up against what is wrong.

No one seems willing to take a stand against the destruction of our society which is surely progressing almost daily. 

A politician the other day was furious that there was only one big business available in the black area of Baltimore for the animals to burn down. He demanded to know how the vermin could be effective in their rioting if there wasn't sufficient white businesses to destroy. 

This is considered normal and acceptable and anyone criticizing it is considered racist. No one said a damn thing about what he said. How did we get here where that is taken in stride?

My only comment beyond disbelief is "And they wonder why no one wants to set up shop in their 'hoods'"

This is the future where such ideas and mentality is considered normal and acceptable which will be our downfall and what I rail against. This is what needs to be fought strenuously by all decent people.

As to the blacks, unless they get taught better the race war they are calling for will come. Right now they $hit in their own hovels they've destroyed and no one cares overly much. They've already turned nice areas into $hitholes so burning them down and further destroying them can only be seen as an improvement. 

The war will come though when they try to take their wanton destruction into other neighborhoods, non-black, neighborhoods. Then they'll find out that people are not going to put up with their sick selves. 

Then you'll see it put a stop to. At least I hope and think that is what will happen. 

I remember when they went wild in LA some years ago. The rest of decent LA was ready for them and waiting. 

I knew a lot of people there that were sitting around armed to the teeth just waiting for the scum to come their way. I think it would have turned into a bloodbath if they had. Several military vets I knew had a lot of proscribed weapons they had at the ready and they knew other vets outfitted the same. It would not have been pretty. Auto rifles, grenades, launchers, sniper rifles etc.

That I consider a good thing for it would have sent a message that their conduct was unacceptable and would not be tolerated by the common people even if the politicians and police were allowing them to run rampant. 

Some did stand up, mainly business owners who did fire on the vermin and killed a few. They then stayed away from those who stood up to them. One entire section of town closed itself off to blacks and armed themselves after black politicians called for blacks to destroy that portion of the city. (White area)

They stayed away from them too. They are cowards and always have been. If they can't find an innocent victim unable to fight back they usually don't touch them.

Now though I wonder if people will take that stand. I think they will but twenty years ago there would have been no doubt about it.

Today I'm not sure the government wouldn't attack the whites to let blacks do their worst. There is this disgusting mentality that blacks are entitled to riot, loot, and destroy like the animals so many of them are. 

If it was just the blacks I wouldn't worry but that mentality as I said has seeped into the politicians offices, the police brasses office, and the government in general and its swept into our children's minds.

Don't forget the chief of St. Louis city police who let his officers be attacked rather than be allowed to defend themselves and put down the vermin. 

I have my doubts and as I got into another discussion with someone on Twitter last night and today it just reminded me of the futility of asking for common sense and decency anymore.

The failure to grasp even basic realities by these people is depressing. We have failed not only our children but the children of blacks as well in teaching them or as the case may be, not teaching them. 

Basic reasoning skills, critical thinking skills, moral guidelines of society, all are absent from today's youth and it is applauded instead of mourned. Its seen as a good thing rather than the horrific thing it is.

So as one man tells me he can't fathom how someone can look older or younger than their actual age, I am left shaking my head.

So as blacks scream racism again and no one stands up to them yet again, as another city just burned while the blacks were allowed to do it yet again, forgive me if I am pessimistic about where we are going.

As I've said on many issues and will say again, I hope I'm wrong.

 

 

Lena Dunham and What Didn't Happen.

Okay.
A couple of things here.

This is probably going to set a bunch of people off as in they're going to go nuts about it. 

That is of course if they read it. 

The second is I know virtually nothing about Lena Dunham. What I have learned in last two days is she is some sort of liberal something with a show on HBO I believe it is. 

I know nothing about her and to my knowledge have never seen her in anything even. 

I'm right wing and can't stand liberals for the most part. 

With that said what's going on now with her and some sections from her book is revolting and disgusting to me.

Not for the reasons you probably think though. 

In her book she states she was curious at seven years of age if her one year old sister's vagina was the same as hers and asked her mother who told her yes but smaller. 

In the book she states a short time later she was alone with the baby and looked at her sister's vagina by opening its lips in order to see it. 

That's it. 

She also says she would give pieces of candy to her sister if she would kiss her on the lips for five seconds. Not French kiss her, just kiss her on the lips. The sister apparently didn't mind as she was happy to get the candy and readily agreed to do it.

She was seven years old. 

Any kissing at the time was no doubt innocent and playing at being grown up not some disgusting whatever.

Another thing was that the younger sister wanted to sleep with Lena for most of her childhood and was allowed to do so. Begged each day was the way it was put in the book.

I don't think there is anything at all wrong with that. It does not make it sexual in nature in any way. Even if Lena had sexual thoughts at that young an age about her sister it doesn't appear as if anything was done or occurred acting on those thoughts.

In one section Lena states she masturbated as a teen while her little sister was sleeping in the bed next to her. 

Sleeping! 

So what?

Never does it say anything about doing it in front of her when awake although that often occurs between siblings again out of curiosity usually. 

Not to mention the millions of children who have shared a room across history and one masturbates when the other or others are asleep.   

Somehow this has turned into a huge storm on Twitter and the internet with a right wing website attacking her and flat out saying she molested her sister.

That is flatly not true from what was published. 

It is a lie.

They took excerpts and twisted them claiming they said something they did not say. "Looking at her vagina" became "I molested my sister" even though nothing in the excerpts says anything of the kind. 

Lena apparently made the mistake of inserting adult thoughts and feelings not to mention knowledge in her book recounting these events by framing them with the above mentioned thoughts, feelings and knowledge.

That has added to the firestorm engulfing her.

Some of the framing is rather in my opinion inappropriate but still her thoughts and feelings in her biography as she looked back on her childhood.

While I may find them at the least ill advised to inappropriate it is not my book nor my childhood. 

With that said in the framing she stated such things as she acted as any sexual predator would in chasing a neighborhood girl. 

She says other things that would indicate she was interested in her sister sexually and says them in clearly an adult way.

I seriously doubt that at seven, ten, or thirteen she had any idea of all the things any sexual predator would do going after a child. That is something she placed there in her past as an adult with adult thought and knowledge. Poor choice but by these sick people taking her adult thoughts and reading it as the thoughts of the child at the time they've made even more of nothing.

I find it hard to see a young child or even teen reflecting the things Lena said in this book about herself when she actually was a child. Maybe she sees herself in that light now and ascribes things to her then self that she feels now but that does not mean her child self thought that way or acted that way. 

The other thing is all the things she says now as an adult are obviously not true as to her child self or she would have preyed on her younger sister, forcing sex onto her which she did not do. 

Do you think an actual sexual predator would spend ten years dying to do the kid and never do it? Seriously? A predator just by being one would assault the kid to meet their needs and to hell with the kid. That didn't happen.

Histrionics of this generation have made her clearly embellish and fabricate aspects to this story. Just look at the pebbles part. In it she says her sister was playing a game with her by doing that and cackled when she pulled on on her sister by freaking her out. 

That is certainly possible for a younger child to do something like that but for one problem. It was a one year old baby. What one year old baby is even capable of such? 

None

 
What she doesn't say is that she ever did anything to her sister. Whether there ever was any sexual contact between them is not addressed in anything I've read so far and nothing I've seen leads me to believe there is. If there was she hasn't said so or even hinted at it.

If there was which is possible as siblings often experiment as children, its not been written about in her book or someone missed the "Big" story.

Even if there had been that doesn't necessarily mean anyone molested anyone else nor that anyone was a victim of molestation. 

Matter of fact Dr. Charles Sofie of the Los Angeles Child Protective Services Division. The head or number two man of the agency and Dr. Phil's expert on his show categorically stated today on CNN twice that Lena Dunham did NOT in any way molest her sister at any time. 

He stated that what took place was NOT child molestation but normal stuff kids do. 

This is the expert that Dr. Phil uses and everyone knows he is dead against child molestation. He is also the big guy at the largest child protective agency in the country I believe and he says no to allegations that she molested her younger sister. 

What troubles me though beyond this is the recurring pathology in this country regarding sexuality and children. Even putting those two words in one sentence will get people howling in outrage.

I've had people say children have no sexuality and attack me for suggesting they indeed do. I've had them insist children are not sexual at all until the teen years, the mid teen years at that. 

There is even a movement in this country to say that no child under fifteen ever has any interests in anything sexual, doesn't like or ever want to do anything sexual unless they've been molested or exposed to sex inappropriately. That covers seeing pornographic material to seeing sexual acts being done by others. 

Except for those two things happening according to them no child even knows they have private parts for anything beyond peeing until the mid teen years. 

They actually think this and have gotten a lot of the psychological community to ascribe to those insane notions. 

The idea of children's sexuality is not some weird idea resident in my head but actual fact that people somehow deny and that worries me. 

This level of hatred over a little kid looking at another little kid's private parts is unbelievable.

I would strongly suggest people take a 'Human Sexuality' course at their local college to get educated about the subject.

Kids are sexual beings from even before they are born and this has been proven for sixty years or better. They don't just start being at sixteen as I've seen some say. It used to be known that children were from birth but science has shown in recent years sexual activity of babies en utero expanding the knowledge of the subject.

They are curious about their bodies and those of others. They look and explore their own body and other children's bodies just as well. 

They engage in sex play, sexual experimentation, sexual exploration or whatever term you wish to use. One of the oldest and most well known expressions is "Playing Doctor."

This is all normal and natural, completely so. 

There is nothing wrong, sick, perverted, criminal or damaging, if its not forced or coerced in any way, with it. 

Its called growing up.

Yet more and more people seem to be taking the idea that children who do any normal sexual development stuff are somehow bad or even molesters. Children are actually being charged now with child molestation in cases where they've engaged in sex play with kids. 

We're sending umpteen thousands of kids to jail as child molesters now and branding them as sexual offenders for life just for being normal kids and people seem okay with that.

Now a woman who admitted that she looked at her baby sister's vagina when the older was but seven years old is being wholesale attacked and charged with child molestation by these sick people. 

Its the people who have the hang ups about sex who are the sick ones not the innocent seven year old engaging in completely innocent activity to satisfy her curiosity. 

When did our society become so twisted as to ascribe perversion to normal kids play? When did it become so perverted as to take complete innocence and turn it into something so ugly and nasty? 

When?

But now these sick individuals are screaming with calls that she should be arrested for child molestation. Its not enough they want to twist innocent curiosity into perversion but now they want to criminalize it.

The funny thing is that child molestation used to have something to do with actually committing a sexual act on a child. That means something that is done for the purpose of arousing one or both of the parties. 

I wasn't aware that a seven year old curious about her body and that of her sister taking a quick look qualifies as remotely sexual in nature. 

There was no playing, fondling, rubbing, stimulation, nothing. Just looking at it.

Yet today it apparently does and both this woman and her sister have been placed into the center of a shit storm they neither caused nor deserved. 

If anyone is a victim of anything here it is these sisters from these sick people who see the most innocent of things as dirty and wrong. 

What scares me more is these same sick individuals probably have children of their own or will. What will their perverted thoughts on normal childhood sexuality and development do to them.

I wonder how many have or will end up putting their kids into jail for playing doctor?